Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Purchasers of Trex Decking Certified as Nationwide Class

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3584 | Consumer Products | 07/27/2004

The class has been certified in a nationwide lawsuit filed against Trex Company, Inc., on behalf of persons who purchased Trex decking materials between 1992 and 2004. The action alleges that Trex is defective and does not meet its marketing and warranty assertions, in violation of state consumer protection laws. Persons eligible to take part in the action may contact the attorney for the class for more information.

The action alleges that Trex alternative decking is defective-- discoloring, rotting, crumbling, and degrading-- long before its 10-year warranty has expired. Apparently, the material was originally sold with a 99-year warranty, but that was changed relatively soon after marketing started. The lawsuit seeks to force Trex to pay for repair costs or to replace defective material and cover costs of sealants. In a separate claim, the class of consumers alleges Trex violated the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act by breaching its warranty. Unspecified damages are sought for this claim, based on the 15% higher price Trex charges compared to most pressure-treated lumber products.

In 2000, Trex settled a $14.7 million lawsuit by a New Hampshire lumber distribution company over alleged fraudulent business practices by Trex. Coastal Forest Products of Bedford, NH, claimed Trex misled the company by touting Trex products as maintenance free. Coastal alleged the products have a propensity “to disintegrate, crumble, turn pink, turn blue, spot, bubble, blister, contain lumps, contain hidden defects such as metal objects that work their way to the surface, or grossly warp if exposed to sunlight or weather.” Coastal also claimed that Trex failed to honor its replacement and refund warranties.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest

Netflix settled a class action lawsuit brought against the company in 2004 for allegedly duping potential customers by advertising "unlimited" DVD rentals and "one day delivery." Current and former Netflix customers will receive a one-month perk.
 
Size matters in the rapidly advancing world of computer peripherals. A class action has been filed against Apple Computer, Inc.; Dell, Inc.; Gateway, Inc.; Hewlett-Packard Company; International Business Machines, Inc.; Sharp Electronics Corporation; Sony Corporation; and Toshiba Corporation on behalf of computer hard drive purchasers who allege that the companies' advertising deceptively overstates their hard drives' true capacity in violation of California consumer protection laws.
 
Kahn Gauthier Swick is investigating possible legal actions on behalf of persons who contracted hepatitis A in outbreaks this fall in Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee. The outbreak in Pennsylvania was the largest, with 615 cases as of November 25, including three deaths. Some 300 people were sickened in the other three states.
 
Several class actions have been filed against Italian dairy giant Parmalat Finanziaria S.p.A (Pink: PARAF.PK, formerly OTCBB: PARAF) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 5, 1999, and December 29, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
The class has been certified in numerous consolidated class actions filed against clothier Abercrombie & Fitch Company (NYSE:ANF) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 8, 1999, and October 13, 1999. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Eastern District Court of Texas against Big Lots Stores, Inc., a discount retailer based in Ohio who owns and operates over 1400 stores throughout the United States for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Class members seek unpaid compensation and benefits, unpaid interest, attorney's fees and costs of the action.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.