Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

FTC Accuses Sellers of “Supreme Greens with MSM” and “Coral Calcium Daily” of False Claims

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3557 | Consumer Products | 07/19/2004

An administrative proceeding has been filed by the Federal Trade Commission against Boston-area marketers Direct Marketing Concepts, Inc., ITV Direct, Inc., along with business partners Healthy Solutions, LLC, and Health Solutions, Inc., Triad ML Marketing, Inc., and King Media, Inc., on behalf of all persons who purchased the dietary supplements “Supreme Greens with MSM” and “Coral Calcium Daily.” The action alleges that the companies falsely promoted the supplements as a means to treat, cure, and prevent cancer and other diseases, and to cause significant weight loss, in violation of the federal FTC Act. The action seeks rescission of contracts with the companies, restitution, and disgorgement by the companies and their principals of ill-gotten gains.

The lawsuit also charges the principals of the companies: Donald Barrett, Alejandro Guerrero (a.k.a. Alex Guerrero), Michael Howell, Greg Geremesz; and Allen Stern. The FTC’s complaint further alleges that Direct Marketing Concepts (DMC), ITV, and Barrett failed to disclose that the 30-minute infomercial promoting Supreme Greens is a paid commercial advertisement and not an independent television program, and that these defendants charged consumers’ credit cards for automatic product shipments without authorization.

According to the FTC, defendants DMC, ITV, Barrett, Healthy Solutions LLC, Health Solutions, Inc., Guerrero, Howell, and Geremesz (the Supreme Greens defendants) began marketing Supreme Greens in August 2003 through a nationally disseminated infomercial featuring Barrett and Guerrero. The infomercial promoted Supreme Greens as an effective treatment to cure or prevent cancer, heart disease, diabetes, and arthritis. The FTC also alleges that the defendants claimed Supreme Greens will cause significant weight loss of up to four pounds a week and up to 80 pounds in eight months, and that the product is safe for everyone, including pregnant women, children, and persons on medication.

The FTC’s complaint alleges that the Supreme Greens defendants violated the FTC Act by making deceptive efficacy and safety claims for the product. In addition, the complaint alleges that these defendants deceptively represented that the infomercial viewers were watching was an independent TV program, when it was in fact paid commercial advertising. Further, according to the FTC, defendants DMC, ITV, and Barrett charged automatic shipments of the product to consumers’ credit or debit cards without proper authorization.

The FTC’s complaint also alleges that defendants DMC and Barrett, together with Triad ML Marketing, Inc., King Media, Inc., and Allen Stern, marketed Coral Calcium Daily to consumers throughout the United States beginning in 2002. Coral Calcium Daily is a dietary supplement that purportedly contains a form of calcium derived from marine coral. According to the FTC, the defendants promoted the product through a nationally televised infomercial featuring Kevin Trudeau and Robert Barefoot, whom the FTC sued in June 2003 in connection with an infomercial promoting another coral calcium product. The Coral Calcium Daily infomercial aired on national cable networks such as PAX Television, Women’s Entertainment, and the Food Network. The defendants also advertised in free-standing newspaper inserts, and sold the product through retail outlets such as CVS, Rite Aid, and Walgreen’s. According to the FTC, the defendants promoted Coral Calcium Daily as an effective means to prevent, treat, and cure cancer, heart disease, and various degenerative and autoimmune diseases including multiple sclerosis, lupus, and Parkinson’s disease. In addition, the FTC alleges that the defendants had no basis for their claims that Coral Calcium Daily was superior to other calcium supplements in terms of the amount of calcium absorbed by the body and the speed of that absorption, and that the defendants had no basis for claiming that scientific research published in the Journal of the American Medical Association and the New England Journal of Medicine proves that calcium supplements are able to prevent, reverse, or cure cancer in humans. The FTC alleges that the defendants’ health benefit and superior bioavailability claims for Coral Calcium Daily are false and/or unsubstantiated.

In a related action, on April 19, 2004, the Food and Drug Administration sent a warning letter to Barrett, president of ITV and DMC, stating that labeling for the firm’s dietary supplement product Supreme Greens with MSM, including a brochure and customer letter included when the product was ordered, caused the product to be out of compliance with the provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The brochure and letter contained unsubstantiated claims about the product’s benefits such as “[n]atural weight loss,” “balance the body’s pH,” and “neutralize acidity...heartburn, acid-reflux.” In addition, disease claims were made on the firm’s website. For example, the product claimed to “helped (sic) thousands of people with cancer, diabetes, arthritis, lupus, fibromyalgia, chronic fatigue syndrome....” These claims allegedly cause the product to be an unapproved new drug. Subsequently, a response from the firm’s attorneys stated that they intend to remove all violative claims from advertisements for the products. The FDA will continue to monitor the marketplace to ensure that this product remains lawfully marketed. For additional information, please visit: http://www.fda.gov/foi/warning_letters/g4690d.pdf


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest

Insight Communications, a broadband service in Kentucky, Indiana, Illinois and Ohio, faces a class action lawsuit that four Insight customers filed against the company in Jefferson Circuit Court, claiming breach of contract and consumer protection violations resulting from loss of service.
 
Deregulation of the market has done stockholders no favors. Several class actions have been filed against jewelry retailer Friedman's, Inc. Friedman's, Inc. (NYSE: FRM, formerly Nasdaq: FRDM) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 26, 2000, through November 17, 2003, and all those who purchased Friedman's shares in its offering on February 11, 2002, for $9.50 per share and its offering on September 18, 2003, for $15.00 per share. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
The parties have reached a tentative multimillion dollar settlement in an action filed against United Parcel Service, Inc. on behalf persons who bought "excess value" package insurance from UPS going as far back as 1984. The action alleges that UPS overcharged for the insurance in violation of state and federal laws. Customers will be able to apply for UPS vouchers once the settlement is finalized.
 
Free should mean that you don't have to pay, right? A nationwide class action has been filed against The Musicland Group, Inc.; Musicland Retail, Inc.; Suncoast Group, Inc.; and Media Play, Inc. on behalf of consumers who allege that the companies' music and media stores deceived thousands of customers by failing to disclose credit card charges associated with a supposedly free offer to receive Entertainment Weekly magazine.
 
A national class action has been filed in Florida against mobile phone giant, AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents who have either been charged an early termination fee for canceling their AT&T Wireless service, or who have been forced to maintain their AT&T Wireless service in order to avoid early termination fees. The AT&T Wireless users allege that AT&T has breached its contract with customers by not providing adequate service and by not investigating problems with service sufficiently. The action is brought under state contract law and state laws regulating unfair and deceptive business practices and seeks compensatory and punitive damages as well as disgorgement of profits.
 
A $5 billion class-action lawsuit has been filed in federal courts by multiple attorneys in several states against DuPont Co. saying the company failed to warn consumers of the dangers of a Teflon chemical.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.