Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Bank of America Loan Officers Claim No Overtime was a Bad Deal

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3539 | Employment | 07/12/2004

A national collective action has been filed in Minnesota against financial giant, Bank of America. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former Bank of America loan officers who were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks compensatory, statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.

According to the loan officers, Bank of America has engaged in a willful and intentional course of action to defraud them of proper overtime compensation. The loan officers claim that Bank of America frequently required them to work well in excess of 40 hours per week. However, according to the loan officers, the company has no provisions in place to properly compensate them for these hours. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, all "non-exempt" employees are entitled to a minimum of time and a half for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week. "Non-exempt" employees are generally those that work on an hourly basis and do not have managerial or executive responsibility. While the employees bringing this action have been classified as "exempt" by Bank of America, they claim that they are in reality "non-exempt" and therefore entitled to receive overtime compensation for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The loan officers also claim that because Bank of America's refusal to pay overtime was willful and intentional, they are entitled to an equal amount of liquidated damages.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

In a lawsuit filed in federal court, twenty-one former employees of CooperSurgical Inc. charged the Company with age discrimination in connection with their terminations following CooperSurgical's acquisition of Milex Products, Inc. in February 2004.
 
California law makes it illegal for companies to take away, or "charge back" an employee's commissions in certain circumstances. A class action has been filed against Airtouch Cellular of California, Verizon Wireless Services, LLC, and Cellco Partnership on behalf of current and former Verizon sales employees who have worked in a California-based telemarketing center or retail outlet, alleging that the company compels them to return commissions on failed wireless subscriptions and also fails to calculate overtime pay properly, in violation of California unfair business practices and labor laws.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Keramac Management. The case involves violations of federal labor law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
On Tuesday, October 18, 2005, three African American former employees of UBS Financial Services, Inc. ("UBSFS"), filed a class action lawsuit against the company in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York alleging racial discrimination in hiring, promotion and other employment practices. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of all African Americans who were, are, or will be employed, or who sought employment at UBSFS, as brokers, non-broker officers, and other professional positions. The lawsuit seeks to put an end to years of racial discrimination at UBSFS.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against Hillsborough County. The action is brought on behalf of all current and past county employees, most of which were employed by the county as engineers, who were not paid overtime compensation by the county. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks back pay, statutory damages and liquidated damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants must "opt-in" to the case in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.
 
Grocery chain Smart & Final reached a tentative $19 million agreement in a class-action lawsuit claiming employees were not properly paid. The employees alleged the Los Angeles-based chain failed to properly calculate overtime pay and also neglected to pay for all hours worked. The suit also alleged other compensation was not paid.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.