Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Pfizer Accused of Misleading Floridians About Off-Label Uses of Neurontin

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3518 | Drugs / Medical | 06/29/2004

A class action has been filed against pharmaceutical manufacturer Pfizer, Inc., Parke-Davis, and Warner-Lambert Company on behalf of persons who paid out-of-pocket expenses for the drug Neurontin (gabapentin), who allege that the companies harmed consumers by conspiring to circumvent drug approval regulations set up by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and promoting scientifically unproven "off-label" use of the drug, in violation of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and triple punitive damages.

The FDA gave Parke-Davis approval to market Neurontin as an epilepsy drug in 1993. In 1995, Parke-Davis allegedly decided that it did not want to undertake the clinical trials that FDA requires in order to approve new uses for a prescription drug because it would be too expensive and time consuming. The company decided to launch a broad campaign to promote the drug for treating at least 13 separate conditions, including migraines, bipolar disorder and restless leg syndrome by hiring outside firms to help exploit a loophole in government regulations that prohibit the promotion of drugs for unapproved uses, except in published research and medical education. Disguised as "medical education" for the doctors or "consulting" for the company, that campaign allegedly included illegal cash kickbacks to physicians and other sales ploys to pump up sales of the drug for non-FDA approved uses.

Parke-Davis allegedly recruited and paid numerous physicians to participate in sham studies that the company then publicized to persuade other physicians to prescribe Neurontin in doses far higher than FDA authorizes. In addition, the action charges, the company paid physicians to attach their names to scientific articles promoting the off-label use of Neurontin, even though the articles were ghost-written by third-party authors instead of by the doctors paid by Parke-Davis. FDA regulations require that such studies be independently authored.

Parke-Davis also allegedly recruited physicians--including those who wrote high volumes of Neurontin prescriptions--to act as consultants to the company, paying them to attend meetings at hotels and resorts. In this scheme, physicians were not required to provide consulting services, but instead sat through presentations by the company which were designed to influence their prescription-writing behavior.

It has been widely noted that the off-label uses Parke-Davis promoted are not medically accepted by the American Hospital Formulary Service Drug Information, or any relevant peer-reviewed literature. Parke-Davis was acquired by Pfizer when it bought Warner-Lambert in 2000. Parke-Davis was successful in its off-label strategy-- published reports state that 78% of Neurontin prescriptions had been written for treatments other than epilepsy, earning sales revenues of $1.3 billion.

Pfizer recently agreed in a Department of Justice settlement to plead guilty to violating the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act. Along with a criminal fine, the agreement includes $152 million in civil fines to be shared among state and federal Medicaid agencies and whistle-blower David Franklin.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Drugs / Medical Cases of Interest

The issue of corporate health plan prescription contraceptive coverage is growing quickly. A class action has been filed against DaimlerChrysler Corporation on behalf of women employees who allege that the company discriminated against them by failing to include prescription contraceptives in its health plan coverage in violation of federal civil rights laws.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the District Court of South Carolina against Tenet South Carolina, Inc., DBA Hilton Head Regional Medical Center. The case involves violations of contract law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
The parties have reached a final $4 million settlement in several consolidated class actions filed against healthcare information provider Medirisk, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: MDMD) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased Medirisk common stock between May 4, 1998, and June 30, 1998, or traceable to the company’s secondary offering on June 11, 1998. Persons eligible to participate in the settlement must file a proof of claim postmarked no later than April 30, 2004.
 
Several class actions have been filed against nutritional supplement manufacturer NBTY, Inc., (NYSE: NTY) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 22, 2004, and June 16, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against direct-to-consumer specialty medical products provider PolyMedica Corporation (Nasdaq: PLMD) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 23, 2001, and June 30, 2003.
 
Several class actions have been filed against medical device company Synovis Life Technologies, Inc., (Nasdaq:SYNO) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 16, 2003, and May 18, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.