Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Duncan-Williams Series 2000 Municipal Bondholders File Lawsuit

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3517 | Stocks | 06/29/2004

A class action has been filed against investment banking firm Duncan-Williams, Inc., by bondholders who purchased from Duncan-Williams Series 2000 municipal bonds issued by Capstone Improvement District of Brookwood, Alabama (Capstone bonds). The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by misrepresenting and failing to disclose material facts in connection with the sale of Capstone bonds to plaintiffs and other purchasers. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their bonds.

The lawsuit further alleges that Duncan-Williams failed to discharge properly its duties as underwriter of the bond issue in question. The suit alleges that Duncan-Williams' conduct violated Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5, the Tennessee Securities Act, and the common law of Tennessee. The lawsuit seeks certification of a class consisting of individuals and entities that purchased Capstone bonds from Duncan-Williams.

Bonds are known as "fixed-income" securities because the amount of income the bond will generate each year is "fixed," or set, when the bond is sold. No matter what happens or who holds the bond, it will generate exactly the same amount of money. There are four basic kinds of bonds, all defined by who is selling the debt. The first are bonds sold by the U.S. government and government agencies. The second are bonds sold by corporations. The third type of bonds are those sold by state and local governments. The last type of bond investors might encounter are bonds sold by foreign governments, although these can be difficult for the individual investor to buy and sell outside of a mutual fund.

If you purchased Capstone bonds issued by Duncan-Williams during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by August 16, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against Direct General Corporation (NasdaqNM:DRCT), a financial services holding company company and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 11, 2003 and January 26, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against mutual fund companies Allianz Dresdner Asset Management of America, LP and PIMCO Advisors Distributors, LLC by investors who purchased any shares of a number of PIMCO funds between February 23, 1999, and February 17, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by allowing certain favored investors to time their trades to the detriment of the investing public.
 
The parties have reached a tentative $4.5 million settlement in several actions filed against PHP Healthcare Corporation and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 27, 1995, and November 19, 1998. Persons eligible to participate in the settlement must file a proof of claim postmarked no later than May 13, 2004.
 
Several class actions have been filed against communications and security systems engineering specialists Wireless Facilities, Inc. (Nasdaq:WFII), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 26, 2000, and August 4, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
The market can offer many traps for even the most careful investor. Several class actions have been filed against investment giants UBS PaineWebber, Inc., and UBS Warburg, LLC, by investors who purchased GOALs(+) Equity Linked Notes, including WorldCom, Inc., Nokia Corporation, The Home Depot, Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., and other GOALs(+) linked to other companies, and issued by UBS AG and offered for sale and sold by the defendants, under SEC File Number 333-46930 by means of prospectuses filed by UBS with the SEC on November 21, 2000; December 8, 2000; December 20, 2000; February 26, 2001; March 29, 2001; and May 17, 2001, supplemented in various GOALs(+) prospectus supplements. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations in their prospectuses so that investors bought what were, in effect, worthless or severely devalued stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products, N.V. (LHSP), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 28, 1998 and November 8, 2000. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.