Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Ford Motor Credit Settles with 1991-1995 “Red Carpet” Lessees for $6.5 Million

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3502 | Automotive | 06/22/2004

The parties have reached a settlement apparently valued at $6.5 million in a 38-state action filed against Ford Motor Credit Corporation on behalf of Ford and Lincoln Mercury “Red Carpet” lease customers who allege that the company overcharged them for early lease termination fees between 1991 and 1995. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the settlement claims administrator for more information.

The settlement provides a $100 cash payment to qualified customers who purchased leased vehicles in the early to mid-1990s. The lawsuit filed in 38 states claims customers with Ford and Lincoln Mercury products were overcharged when they returned their "red carpet" lease vehicles early and subsequently purchased the vehicle. Customers who returned a leased vehicle between 1991 and 1994 will be contacted by mail at their last known address. Anyone who returned a leased Ford vehicle after 1995 will have to register for the $100 refund by calling the settlement administrator.

The company's "Red Carpet" leasing program came under scrutiny when investigators found that customers were forced to pay charges that were sometimes higher than the actual balance owed in the lease. Dealers notified customers of the balance due, which included an additional charge not owed to Ford Motor Credit under the terms of the lease. The dealer would keep the extra charged to customers, who were unaware of the correct figure, according to the office of Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox.

Persons who leased a Ford or Lincoln Mercury vehicle through a “Red Carpet” lease in the following states may be eligible to take part in the settlement: Alabama, Arizona, Arkansas, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Nebraska, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Virginia, it's Washington, and Wisconsin.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Automotive Cases of Interest

Ford has settled a class-action lawsuit over the troublesome plastic intake manifolds on certain Ford and Lincoln-Mercury models from the 1996 through 2002 model years. The settlement was reached in June 2005 but needed final approval by the court.
 
A California statewide notice program authorized by California's Sacramento County Superior Court began to issue notices to those who bought, owned or leased 1991-2001 model year Ford Explorers.
 
A class action has been filed against Aetna Health, Inc., a subsidiary of healthcare giant Aetna, Inc., on behalf of Pennsylvania residents (1) who, between September 26, 1999, and the date of the final judgment in the action, were injured in a motor vehicle accident while insured under an Aetna heathcare plan; and (2) whose tort recovery from the accident was subject to a lien asserted by Aetna. The action seeks compensatory and statutory damages for monies collected via the liens as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
A statewide class action has been filed in Ohio against Envirotest Systems Corporation on behalf of all Ohio residents who, since December 1995, have taken their automobiles to an Ohio E-Check facility for mandatory emissions testing and were charged for the test when their vehicle failed the test. The automobile owners are seeking declaratory and injunctive relief as well as damages of no less than $25,000.
 
A class action has been filed against Speedway Chevrolet of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma, and its parent company, Sonic Automotive, Inc., on behalf of Oklahoma consumers who have purchased autos from the dealership, and who allege that the dealership and its parent engage in “stuffing” practices where they defraud customers by tricking them into buying unwanted or unneeded extras during car deals.
 
A U.S. District Court judge has granted class-action status in a lawsuit against three defendants in the Thaxton bankruptcy case.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.