Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Alliance Gaming Corporation Gambles on Illicit Stock Price Inflation as Growth Strategy

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3491 | Stocks | 06/22/2004

Several class actions have been filed against worldwide gaming company Alliance Gaming Corporation (NYSE:AGI) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 15, 2004, and June 7, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The complaint alleges that the artificial stock price inflation allowed Alliance to consummate stock-for-stock acquisitions with inflated stock valued at $16 million. During the applicable period, certain individual defendants allegedly sold $3.6 million worth of their own shares at artificially inflated prices.

The action alleges that the defendants actively concealed the following facts from the investing public that: (1) the company was experiencing massive problems and delays associated with its Wide Area Progressive games in Nevada due to regulatory hold-ups; (2) it was experiencing massive delays in its approval and deployment of New York VLT game revisions; (3) its margins were being slashed by increased costs associated with central and traditional determination products; (4) the company’s acquisition of Sierra Design Group was suffering from massive integrative problems; (5) it was losing its competitive position and experiencing problems in its video product game unit; and (6) as a result, the defendants’ forecasts for fiscal year 2004 of $1.04 and fiscal year 2005 of $1.40 per share, were grossly inflated, as it later admitted.

On June 8, 2004, Alliance issued a press release updating its guidance for fiscal year 2004 to the range of $0.96 to $1.00 per share, compared to the prior guidance of $1.04, and for fiscal year 2005 to a range of $1.20 to $1.30 compared to prior guidance of $1.40. On this news, Alliance shares plunged $5.24 to close at $16.15 per share.

If you purchased securities issued by Alliance Gaming Corporation during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by August 16, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against IT Group, Inc.(ITXG.PK), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 21, 1998 and December 23, 2000. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against e-messaging protection and transaction services provider Zix Corporation (Nasdaq:ZIXI) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 30, 2003, and May 4, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Baxter International, Inc., a global health care products maker, (NYSE: BAX) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between April 19, 2001 and July 21, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against biotechnology company Biopure Corporation (Nasdaq:BPUR) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 17, 2003, and December 24, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations regarding Biopure’s blood replacement product to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against clothing manufacturer Tropical Sportswear International Corporation (Nasdaq: TSIC) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 17, 2002, and January 20, 2003. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against Central Freight Lines, Inc. (Nasdaq: CENF) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock pursuant to its December 12, 2003, initial public offering. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.