Guam Residents Reach $60 Million+ Settlement with Government in Earned Income Tax Credit Case |
 |
 |
|
|
The parties have reached a tentative $60 million settlement in an action filed against the government of Guam on behalf of low-income workers who alleged that the local government failed to correctly credit their taxes. Persons eligible to take part in the action should contact the attorneys for the class or more information. Federal Judge Joaquin Manibusan approved an agreement that will require the government of Guam to pay low-income workers $60 million within the next nine years -- about half the Earned Income Tax Credit the local government failed to pay them since 1998. Eligible taxpayers will receive notification letters and applications forms from the Department of Revenue and Taxation. The former government administration stopped paying the tax credit, calling it an unfunded federal mandate, and the current administration continued the policy by denying taxpayers the ability to claim it. The tax credit, which was created by the federal government in 1973, is intended as an incentive to keep the working poor on the job.
The settlement also requires the government to begin paying the tax credits in full from now on. Forms will be mailed to taxpayers at their last known address, and the Department of Revenue and Taxation is expected to pay about $20 million in tax credits during the first year and about $5 million a year during the following 8 years.
Though the stated settlement amount is $60 million, the parties recently announced that the Guam government would pay out an estimated $120-160 million in tax credits over the next six years during a recent joint press conference between Acting Governor Kaleo Moylan, Attorney General Douglas Moylan, and the plaintiffs’ attorneys.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Family Cases of Interest
More than 9,000 people who received shots to ward off hepatitis A after an outbreak at a Chi-Chi's restaurant can make a claim in an $800,000 class-action settlement.
The federal judge overseeing Chi-Chi's bankruptcy has approved notice to the
9,489 people who got immune globulin shots from the Pennsylvania Department
of Health after the outbreak was publicized in early November 2003. Low-income citizens, backed by antipoverty groups, filed a class action that challenges a federal law requiring proof of citizenship in exchange for benefits under the government's Medicaid health insurance program for the poor. Critics say the law, set to go into effect July 1, will hurt the vulnerable who may be unable to provide original documents like birth certificates. Those most in jeopardy are those in nursing homes, with mental and physical disabilities, and the victims of natural disasters. A class action has been filed against Temple-Inland, Inc., a manufacturer of composite hardwood siding for residences and other structures, on behalf of all Missouri residents whose homes or buildings have been fitted with siding manufactured by Temple-Inland. The action claims that the siding is defective. Ten high school students from the state of California filed a class action lawsuit against the state over the high school exit exam. The lawsuit could turn around the fate of an estimated 100,000 students from the class of 2006 who may not graduate this June because of failing the standardized test, required for a diploma starting this year. Numerous class actions have been filed against nonprofit hospitals in Illinois, Minnesota, Ohio, Texas, Georgia, Alabama, Florida and Tennessee, on behalf of uninsured patients who allege that the hospitals do not honor their promise of charity care as defined in their tax-exempt status. The suits claim that the hospitals are charging uninsured patients "sticker" price while insurance companies negotiate large discounts for the same services provided to those with medical coverage, violating the hospitals’ tax-exempt status. When a business contracts with consumers to carry out services such as filing real estate deeds, it is legally liable if it fails to carry out its end of the agreement. The parties have reached a tentative $650,000 settlement in a class action filed against Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation and South Coast Title Company on behalf of persons who (1) at any time after February 9, 1997, paid off their residential home loans secured by deeds of trust on real property within California, in a transaction in which South Coast served as the title company, escrow or sub-escrow company, and (2) paid reconveyance or release of obligation fees to South Coast, but who did not receive either a reconveyance or release of obligation from the company. Claim forms must be postmarked on or before October 8, 2003, to be considered valid.
|