Starbucks Managers Boil Over for Overtime |
 |
 |
|
|
A national collective action has been filed in Florida against Starbucks Coffee Company. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former Starbucks managers, who since June 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
According to the managers, Starbucks has engaged in a willful and intentional course of action to defraud them of proper overtime compensation. The managers claim that Starbucks frequently requires them to work well in excess of 40 hours per week. However, according to the managers, the company has no provisions in place to properly compensate them with overtime for these hours. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, all "non-exempt" employees are entitled to a minimum of time and a half for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week. "Non-exempt" employees are generally those that work on an hourly basis and do not have managerial or executive responsibility. While the employees bringing this action have been classified as "exempt" managers by Starbucks, they claim that they are in reality "non-exempt" and therefore entitled to receive overtime compensation for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The managers claim that they perform limited managerial functions, exercise very little authority and essentially perform the same duties as hourly employees. According to the mangers, only 10% of their time on the job is spent performing "managerial" tasks, with the remainder being spent servicing customers. For this reason, the managers claim that they are entitled to overtime compensation. The managers also claim that because Starbuck's refusal to pay overtime was willful and intentional, they are entitled to an equal amount of liquidated damages.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Employment Cases of Interest
A class action lawsuit has been filed in District Court of Massachusetts against Robert Half International, Inc. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. What do you do when your paycheck is cut off and you can't gain access to your retirement fund? In the wake of such an action, a class action has been filed by employees of Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. against the shipping company, its parent company, CNF, Inc., and T. Rowe Price, who managed Emery's retirement accounts. Continental Tire North America Inc. retirees have filed a class-action lawsuit against the company over medical benefits. Federal law calls employers who maintain retirement plans for their employees to act as trustworthy fiduciaries. A class action has been filed against Sears Roebuck & Company on behalf of participants in Sears’ 401(k) plan who allege that the company violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act by failing to disclose nonpublic information about its financial condition. A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Middle District Court of Florida against Fenaggi Business Corporation, F&T Business Corporation, Green Light of Jacksonville Corporation and Running Billboard Corporation for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Class members seek unpaid overtime compensation, attorney's fees and costs. Federal law protects workers from unexpected job losses due to surprise layoffs. A class action has been filed against theme park owner Florida Cypress Gardens, Inc. on behalf of former employees who allege that they were laid off without the proper 60 days' notice in violation of the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.
|