Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

IDACORP Generated Controversy By Failing to Disclose Problems

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3446 | Stocks | 06/01/2004

Several class actions have been filed against electricity generation utility IDACORP, Inc. (NYSE:IDA) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 1, 2002, and June 4, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The action alleges that IDACORP failed to disclose the following material adverse facts: (1) that it failed to take account of the negative impact of lower volatility and reduced pricing spreads in the Western wholesale energy market would have on its marketing subsidiary, IDACORP Energy; (2) that it was forced to limit its origination activities to shorter-term transactions due to increasing regulatory uncertainty and continued deterioration of credit-worthy counter parties; (3) that it failed to consider the lingering effects from last year's regional drought on Idaho Power’s ability to generate electricity; and (4) that, as a result of these problems, the defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about the company and its earnings projections.

On June 4, 2002, IDACORP, citing stagnant wholesale energy markets and the continued pressure of drought, lowered its 2002 earnings guidance to a range between $1.35 and $1.70 per share. News of this shocked the market, shares of IDACORP falling $5.80 per share (17.26%) to close at $27.80 per share on June 4, 2002.

If you purchased securities issued by IDACORP during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by July 26, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against Home Depot, Inc. (HD), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 29, 2001 and February 22, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against computer technology giant Hewlett-Packard Company (NYSE:HPQ) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who sold the company's common stock between September 4 and November 5, 2001. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose Director Walter Hewlett's opposition to the 2001 merger with Compaq Computer Corporation, thereby artificially deflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A seller of online marketing tools sued Google Inc., on June 29, 2005, charging that the Web search giant has failed to protect users of its advertising program from "click fraud," costing them at least $5 million.
 
According to a law firm press release, a class action lawsuit was filed on May 30, 2008 against Tomo Therapy, Inc. The complaint charges TomoTherapy and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. TomoTherapy develops, markets, and sells the Hi-Art system, a radiation therapy system for the treatment of various types of cancers.
 
A class action against former directors of embattled Gold Coast company Octaviar is seeking $80 million in damages, and counting.
 
Several class actions have been filed against pharmacy benefit management company Express Scripts, Inc., (Nasdaq:ESRX) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 29, 2003, and August 3, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.