Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Merrill Lynch Brokerages Pressured to Push ML Funds Before Others

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3434 | Stocks | 05/25/2004

Several class actions have been filed against mutual fund manager Merrill Lynch & Company, Inc., (various stock symbols) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased shares or other ownership units of any of the mutual funds carrying the "Merrill Lynch" brand name through Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., acting as broker between May 20, 1999, and the present. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose that the company systematically applied incentives and demerits to induce the brokerage’s mid-level managers to maximize sales of Merrill Lynch funds. The investors seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their fund shares.

The action alleges that the defendants engaged in an unlawful course of conduct designed to improperly financially advantage themselves to class members’ detriment. The defendants, in contravention of their disclosure obligations, fiduciary responsibilities and National Association of Securities Dealers rules, allegedly failed to properly disclose that they systematically applied incentives and demerits to compel brokerage mid-level managers to maximize sales of mutual funds carrying the Merrill Lynch brand name. In turn, these regional directors, directors and resident managers allegedly brought intense pressure to bear on the financial advisors under their supervision to steer clients away from mutual funds owned or managed by other entities. By investing in the Merrill Lynch funds, class members received a return on their investment that was substantially less than the return on investment that they would have received had they invested the same dollars in a comparable fund.

If you purchased Merrill Lynch funds under these circumstances during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by July 19, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against healthcare facility operator Dynacq International (Nasdaq: DYIIE, formerly Nasdaq: DYII) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 14, 2003, and December 18, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants fraudulently certified that Dynacq's financial statements for the first three quarters of fiscal 2003 were compiled in compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against chemical and polymer company Crompton Corporation (NYSE: CK) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock (or the common stock of its predecessor, Crompton & Knowles Corporation) between October 26, 1998, and October 8, 2002.
 
Several class actions have been filed against microelectronic manufacturer White Electronic Designs Corporation (Nasdaq:WEDC) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 23, 2003, and June 9, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc. (Nasdaq: VRTX) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 27, 2000, and September 24, 2001.
 
A class action has been filed in the Northern District Court of California against Embarcadero Technologies, Inc. (NASDAQ: EMBT), a California based global technologies company, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 20, 2004 and October 27, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS") announces that it has filed suit against Sourcefire, Inc. ("Sourcefire" or the “Company”) (NasdaqGM:FIRE - News), in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, on behalf of shareholders who purchased shares of the Company in connection with its Initial Public Offering ("IPO") on or about March 9, 2007, or thereafter in the open market. KGS has expanded the lawsuit’s defendants beyond the Company, Board of Directors and CFO, to include the underwriters involved in the Offering (including, Morgan Stanley, Lehman Bros., UBS Securities and Jeffries & Co.), who are each charged with including or allowing the inclusion of materially false and misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO, in direct violation of the Securities Act of 1933.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.