Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

SPSS Allegedly Mis-Crunched the Numbers, Violating GAAP

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3431 | Stocks | 05/25/2004

Several class actions have been filed against analytical software provider SPSS, Inc. (Nasdaq:SPSSE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 2, 2001, and March 30, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The action alleges that SPSS failed to disclose and misrepresented the following material adverse facts: (1) that the company overstated its revenue by between $3 million and $6 million, hiding it through improper recognition of revenue in violation of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles and the company's own accounting interpretations on revenue recognition; (2) SPSS earnings per share were materially inflated; and (3) as a result of the above, the company's financial results were inflated at all relevant times.

On March 30, 2004, SPSS announced that it would delay the filing of its annual report on Form 10-K with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission to complete an additional review initiated by the company. News of this shocked the market. Shares of SPSS fell $2.55 per share or 12.17% on March 31, 2004 to close at $18.40 per share.

If you purchased securities issued by SPSS during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by July 13, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against Terayon Communication Systems, Inc. (TERN), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 28, 2004 and March 1, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against offshore oil well services company Trico Marine Services, Inc. (Nasdaq:TMAR) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 6, 2003, and May 10, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against non-invasive surgical treatments provider HealthTronics Surgical Services, Inc. (Nasdaq: HTRN) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 4, 2000, and July 25, 2003.
 
Centro Properties is fighting a $1 billion-plus joint class actions launched by disgruntled investors who bought in when the stock was riding high, only to find it was near collapse.
 
A class action has been filed against (NYSE:MBI), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 05, 2003 and March 30, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against UnitedHealth Group, Inc. (UNH), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 4, 2001 and April 7, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.