Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

NYFIX in a FIX Because of Misleading Statements and Omissions

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3427 | Stocks | 05/25/2004

Several class actions have been filed against electronic trading technology infrastructure company NYFIX, Inc., (Nasdaq:NYFXE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 30, 2000, and March 30, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The action names as defendants NYFIX, Inc., Peter Kilbinger Hansen, Richard A. Castillo, Mark R. Hahn, George O. Deehan, William J. Lynch and Carl E. Warden. During the applicable period, the defendants allegedly perpetrated a scheme to artificially inflate NYFIX's stock price by issuing a series of materially false and misleading financial statements and press releases which, among other things, overstated the value of NYFIX Millennium, LLC, a private company in which the NYFIX held a substantial ownership interest and which represented a substantial portion of its assets.

NYFIX’s Form 10-K's filed with the SEC for 1999, 2000, 2001, and 2002, and the press releases announcing the company’s financial and business performance for fiscal years 1999 through 2003 were false and misleading because the company allegedly: (1) improperly accounted for its 1999 original investment in, and 2002 acquisition of an additional interest of Millennium; (2) failed to properly allocate losses incurred by Millennium to NYFIX; (3) overstated the value of Millennium on the company's balance sheet; and (4) failed to properly write down goodwill from the 2002 acquisition of Millennium. NYFIX also allegedly failed to properly record $20.1 million in accumulated losses for the years ended December 31, 1999, 2000, and 2001, which would have painted a much different financial picture than was disclosed. The defendants perpetrated this scheme in order to enable the company to raise over $60 million in a public common stock offering and to use its artificially inflated stock along with the cash raised in the offering to purchase other companies.

On March 30, 2004, NYFIX issued a press release which stated, “Based on its discussions with the SEC staff, the company will restate its audited results for the years ended December 31, 1999, through 2002 to change the manner in which it accounted for the 1999 original investment in, and 2002 acquisition of an additional interest of, NYFIX Millennium.'' The market reacted negatively to this news. On the first day of trading after the announcement, NYFIX stock traded on very heavy volume and closed down over 7% at $5.16 per share.

If you purchased securities issued by NYFIX during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by July 13, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against temporary nurse staffing company Cross Country Healthcare, Inc., (Nasdaq:CCRN) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 25, 2001, and August 6, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against PXRE Group Ltd. (PXT), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 28, 2005 and February 16, 2006 or a secondary offering on October 3, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC (“KGS”) announces that it has filed the first class action lawsuit against Netlist, Inc. ("Netlist" or the "Company") (NasdaqGM:NLST), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, on behalf of shareholders who purchased shares of the Company in connection with its Initial Public Offering ("IPO") on or about November 30, 2006, or who purchased shares thereafter in the open market (the "Class Period"). No class has yet been certified in this action.
 
Litigation is ongoing in several consolidated class actions filed against scrap iron company Philip Services Corporation (Pink Sheets:PPSVF.PK), certain of its officers and directors, and affiliated accounting firms by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 28, 1996, and May 7, 1998. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against Alliance Capital Management Holding L.P. (NYSE: AC) and certain of its subsidiaries, officers and directors by investors who purchased shares in any AllianceBernstein mutual fund between October 2, 1998 and September 29, 2003.
 
A class action has been filed against SINA Corporation (NasdaqNM:SINA), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 26, 2004 and February 07, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2009 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.