Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
|
Lancer Corporation in the Drink Because of Securities Fraud Allegations |
 |
 |
|
|
Several class actions have been filed against food and beverage service company Lancer Corporation (NYSE:LAN) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 26, 2000, and February 4, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
The action alleges the defendants represented that Lancer’s revenue was derived from legitimate business transactions, even though substantial revenues were derived as a result of an illegitimate scheme to artificially hike the sales prices of Lancer’s products. In addition, Lancers’ public statements allegedly failed to fully reveal that it had major manufacturing problems, which caused a high defect rate in its products. Lancer also allegedly conspired in a fraudulent scheme with its largest customer, Coca-Cola Company, to artificially create demand for a new line of soda machine dispensers that Lancer was manufacturing for Coca-Cola to sell to its commercial customers.
On January 14, 2004, Lancer announced that the SEC had launched a formal investigation into Lancer’s reporting of its financial statements, revenue and cost recognition, and internal financial and accounting controls. On February 2, 2004, Lancer announced that its longstanding auditor KPMG, LLP, had resigned. Lancer also disclosed that KPMG indicated that the reason for its resignation was that Lancer had not taken timely and appropriate remedial actions with respect to "likely illegal acts." KPMG’s comments contradicted Lancer’s statements on January 30, 2004, that its audit committee had not found sufficient evidence of "intentional misconduct" or "accounting irregularities.” Trading in Lancer shares resumed on May 20, 2004, after nearly four months of being halted due to a government investigation into the fraud allegations involving Coca-Cola Company. Lancer common stock is currently trading well below the $7.50 trading price at which it was halted.
If you purchased securities issued by Lancer Corporation during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by July 14, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Stocks Cases of Interest
Several class actions have been filed against petrochemical giant Exxon Mobil Corporation (NYSE:XOM) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased, owned, or otherwise acquired Mobil shares and whose Mobil shares were exchanged for Exxon Mobil common stock as a result of the merger transaction approved by shareholders on May 27, 1999. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing materially false and misleading financial statements contained in a proxy filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, overstating the Exxon's financial condition by inflating revenue and failing to account for impaired assets in violation of General Accepted Accounting Principles. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. The parties have agreed on a settlement in several class actions that had been filed against Vaso Active Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (OTCBB:VAPH; formerly Nasdaq:VAPH) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 11, 2003, and March 31, 2004. The actions claimed that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Several class actions have been filed against software and consulting company Compuware Corporation (Nasdaq: CPWR) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between June 26, 1999, and April 3, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. A class action has been filed against Fairfax Financial Holdings, Ltd. (FFH), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 24, 2004 and March 21, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Eastern District Court of Kentucky against Maryland based W.R. Grace & Company and certain of its executives and board of directors. The company is a global supplier of catalyst and silica products, construction chemicals, building materials, sealants and coatings. The suit alleges violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Class members seek damages, injunctive relief, interest, attorney's fees and costs. A class action has been filed against First BanCorp (FBP), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 20, 2003 and August 25, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
|
IT'S FREE
Report
Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your
cell phone or computer to the web.
Share
Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.
Read
Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
|
|