Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

SEC and Massachusetts Regulators’ Proceedings Against Putnam Investment Management Nets $110 Million Settlement

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3407 | Stocks | 05/17/2004

The parties have reached a $110 million settlement in several administrative proceedings filed against Putnam Investment Management, LLC, on behalf of shareholders and the investing public. The proceedings alleged that Putnam violated state and federal securities law by failing to disclose improper market timing trading by Putnam portfolio managers and certain clients from 2000 until September 2003. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the attorneys who prosecuted the action for more information.

To get closure on the case, Putnam will pay $110 million, split evenly between the SEC and Massachusetts regulators. The SEC's portion will go to helping shareholders, while the Massachusetts money goes into that state's general fund.

The SEC found that, beginning as early as 1998, at least six Putnam investment management professionals engaged in excessive short-term trading of Putnam mutual funds in their personal accounts. Four of those employees engaged in timed trading in funds over which they had investment decision-making responsibility. Although Putnam became aware in 2000 that several investment management employees were engaging in potentially self-dealing short-term trading of mutual fund shares, the company failed to disclose this potentially self-dealing securities trading to the boards of the mutual funds it managed and the funds' shareholders. A November 13, 2004, SEC order censured Putnam and ordered it to cease and desist from violations of the antifraud provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and other provisions of the federal securities laws.

Stephen M. Cutler, Director of the SEC Division of Enforcement, said, "The significant monetary sanctions we announce today complete the settlement process initiated last November when we imposed far-reaching governance and compliance reforms designed to protect Putnam's mutual fund shareholders. Putnam's $55 million payment — all of which will be placed in a restitution fund for the benefit of investors — makes clear that self-dealing by mutual fund managers will be severely punished. More generally, this case demonstrates the Commission's continuing commitment to investor protection in its enforcement efforts through a combination of tough monetary sanctions, forward-looking structural relief and victim restitution."

The SEC order calls for the appointment of an Independent Distribution Consultant who is charged with developing a plan for distributing the $55 million in disgorgement and penalties to harmed investors. The $55 million will be distributed to investors in order of priority: first, as compensation to investors for losses attributable to excessive short-term trading and market timing trading activity by Putnam employees and, second, as compensation for advisory fees paid by mutual fund clients who suffered such losses.

The Commission's previously filed civil injunctive action charging two Putnam employees, portfolio managers Justin M. Scott and Omid Kamshad, with securities fraud for engaging in excessive short-term trading of Putnam funds in their personal accounts, is pending.

The SEC investigation is continuing.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

Several class actions have been filed against non-hazardous waste disposal company Allied Waste Industries, Inc. (NYSE:AW) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 10, 2004, and July 27, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
A class action has been filed against Tyco International Ltd. (NYSE:TYC), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between June 15, 2002 and December 31, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Northern District Court of Texas against JL Securities, Inc., a Texas based Security Company, for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Class members seek unpaid compensation, attorney's fees and costs.
 
A class action has been filed against Silicon Image, Inc. (NasdaqNM:SIMG), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 19, 2004 and January 24, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in US District Court against insurance giant Chubb Corporation. The case involves violations of federal securities law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A class action has been filed in the Eastern District Court of Michigan against Valassis Communications, Inc., a Michigan based company that markets and distributes coupons and newspaper advertising inserts (NYSE:VCI), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 25, 2002 and October 23, 2002. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.