Asconi Corporation Accused of Stock Fraud |
 |
 |
|
|
Several class actions have been filed against wine importer Asconi Corporation (AMEX:ACD) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 15, 2003, and March 23, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
The action alleges that the defendants misrepresented Asconi's true financial condition and failed to disclose certain related party transactions. As a result, Asconi's financial statements were artificially inflated. Asconi has delayed filing its annual Report on Form 10-K with the SEC. Its stock price collapsed and the stock ceased trading temporarily after the collapse.
If you purchased securities issued by Asconi during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by June 15, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiffs. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Stocks Cases of Interest
The complaint charges certain officers and directors of the underwriter Credit Suisse, as well as credit ratings institutions Moody's and DBRS with misleading investors in regards to the risk levels of Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates. According to a press release dated June 5, 2008, a class action has been commenced on behalf of purchasers of the Fidelity Ultra-Short Bond Fund who purchased the Fund within three years of the filing of this lawsuit, seeking to pursue remedies under the Securities Act of 1933.
A class action has been filed against Brooks Automation, Inc. (BRKS), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 25, 2001 and May 22, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
The parties have reached a tentative settlement, valued at at least $5 million, of a class action filed against FirstPlus Financial Group, Inc. (Pink Sheets: FPFX, formerly OTCBB: FPFX) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 19, 1996, and November 2, 1998. To recover under the settlement, a completed proof of claim postmarked no later than December 19, 2003, must be mailed to the claims administrator. Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS") has filed the first class action lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, on behalf of shareholders who purchased, exchanged or otherwise acquired the common stock of Pegasus Wireless Corp. ("Pegasus" or the "Company'') (OTC BB: PGWC.OB) between December 22, 2005 and September 5, 2006 (the "Class Period").
A class action has been filed against Navarre Corp. (NasdaqNM:NAVR), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 23, 2003 and May 31, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
|