Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

APO Health Settles Indiana Unsolicited Fax Lawsuit for $4.5 Million

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3342 | Miscellaneous | 04/22/2004

The parties have reached a tentative $4.5 million settlement in an action filed against healthcare supply company APO Health, Inc. on behalf of all persons with an Indiana telephone number who received an unsolicited fax advertising APO Health products. The action alleged that the company violated the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) by sending the faxes. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact attorneys for the class as soon as possible.

The TCPA was enacted in 1991 in a climate of widespread concern about the costs associated with unsolicited fax advertisements and the limited ability of the states to deal with the problem. In 1991, two states had enacted measures to regulate intrastate junk faxes, and similar bills were pending in about half the states. The federal government enacted the TCPA to give a uniform set of guidelines to all the states. The act allows the recovery of actual monetary damages, or statutory damages of $500 per violation and $1,500 for each willful violation.

The TCPA is enforceable in federal court by state attorneys general. The act gives the states exclusive jurisdiction over the conditional private right of action created by the statute. To date, Texas is the only state that prohibits private citizens from bringing actions under the statute. Senator Ernest F. Hollings, the TCPA's sponsor, expressed hope that this provision would make it easier for consumers to sue so that telemarketers would be discouraged from utilizing valuable resources to send unsolicited faxes.

Certain rules that apply to unsolicited fax advertisements sent to your home and business fax machines: (1) Advertisements for any goods or services cannot be sent to your fax machine without your prior express permission or invitation; (2) Permission to send unsolicited faxes is presumed to exist if you have an established business relationship with whomever is sending the message; (3) You can end this relationship by telling the company that you do not want to receive any more faxes from them.

The following information must be placed either on the first page or on each page of each solicitation fax you do receive: (1) The date and time the transmission is sent; (2) The identity of the business, other entity, or individual sending the message; and (3) The telephone number of the sender or of the sending fax machine. The telephone number provided may not be a 900 number or any other number for which charges exceed local or long distance telephone charges.

The settlement will not be effective until the court grants it final approval. The court has scheduled a hearing on the matter for June 7, 2004.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Miscellaneous Cases of Interest

Dickson Campers alleges that the city of Mobile violated state law by collecting more taxes inside its 3-mile-wide police jurisdiction, which extends west and south of the city, than the services it provides there. The city also has not -- on an annual basis as it should have -- justified the amount it collects..
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court against the Assil Sinskey Eye Institute for violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). Class members seek statutory and exemplary damages, restitution and disgorgement of profits derived from "junk fax" solicitation, injunctive relief, attorney's fees and interest.
 
Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita changed the face of America forever. Thousands of people lost everything they own, including their jobs, while others lost their lives. Hundreds of thousands of residents will never return to New Orleans and the surrounding areas. While mother nature caused the Hurricane, there are other parties responsible who caused untold financial, property and emotional damage.
 
Royal Dutch/Shell Group agreed to pay about $90 million to settle a lawsuit brought by its U.S. employees after the company overstated its oil and gas reserves by 41 percent. The accord brings to about $240 million costs related to the overstatement, which led to lawsuits, criminal investigations and the ouster of Chief Executive Philip Watts. Insurance will cover $25 million of the settlement, Shell said in a statement July 12, 2005.
 
Major unpaid overtime class action launched against Scotiabank. Action filed on behalf of branch personal bankers
 
A group of 42 out-of-state students and their parents filed a class-action lawsuit against University of California, California State University and community college organizations because they are illegally charging more for out-of-state students than illegal immigrants.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.