Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Acterna Corporation Stockholders Accused Company of Misrepresenting Goodwill

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3329 | Stocks | 04/16/2004

Several class actions have been filed against communications testing company Acterna Corporation (formerly OTCBB: ACTRQ) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 1, 2001, and October 30, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The action alleges that in 2000, Acterna Corporation, formally known as Dynatech Corporation, went on a buying spree in an effort to grow its communications testing business - a sector that accounted for approximately 91% of the company's total revenues. It merged its existing subsidiary, TTC, with Wavetek Wandel Golerman (WWG), the number two and number three companies in the communications testing market. Later in 2000, the company again beefed up its communications testing capabilities by purchasing Superior Electronics Group, Inc., for a purchase price of $171.5 million. Market response to these events was very positive-- in a span of seven months, the stock price soared from $10.37 on February 14, 2000 (the date of the announcement of the merger with WWG), to a peak of $41.38 on August 29, 2000.

In conjunction with these acquisitions, Acterna assumed a tremendous amount of goodwill-- quantified as the excess of purchase price over fair market value of net assets acquired under the purchase method of accounting. Between the WWG and Superior Electronics Group acquisitions alone, the company purportedly acquired over $600 million in goodwill.

Over the next year, the telecom industry entered a freefall which included many of Acterna’s customers. New orders for Acterna’s products began to slip. While the company was able to ward off massive losses due to its backlog of orders, its stock price fell within the intervening year from $41.38 to $6.03.

Throughout the applicable period, the defendants issued numerous statements and filed quarterly reports with the SEC which described the company's financial performance. The statements were materially false and misleading because they failed to disclose or misrepresented the following facts, among others: (1) that in light of the significant adverse change in the company's business climate, Acterna’s goodwill was seriously impaired; (2) that the company lacked adequate internal controls and was therefore unable to ascertain its true financial condition; and (3) as a result, the value of the company's net income and financial results were materially overstated at all relevant times.

On October 31, 2002, Acterna issued a press release announcing a financial results for the second quarter of 2002. In addition to reporting yet another disappointing quarter of sales, the company finally took a charge of $388 million for impaired goodwill stemming from its acquisitions in the communications test sector. Moreover, instead of experiencing a gain of $155-165 million as predicted, the company announced a loss of $284 million.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

According to a recent news story, plaintiffs filed a class action against Apple, Inc., its CEO, CFO, former general counsel and certain board members for participating in a scheme to file false financial statements, thereby concealing millions of dollars in executive compensation though the backdating of stock option grants.
 
CASE DISMISSED: Several class actions were filed against venture capital organization TechHarvest Group, LLC, numerous affiliated companies, and certain of its officers and directors, on behalf of purchasers of membership interests in Harvest AirPrime, LLC; Harvest Storage Technology Group, LLC; and Woodcarvers Limited, LLC, between November 20, 1998, and December 31, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. On February 28, 2006, the United States District Court for the Central District of California entered an Order Dismissing Action and Entering Final Judgment in the Robert T. Harvey Securities Litigation.
 
Several class actions have been filed against energy holding company Progress Energy, Inc. (NYSE: PGN) and certain of its officers and directors on behalf of investors who obtained Contingent Value Obligations (CVOs) in exchange for their Florida Progress common stock pursuant to the closing of the merger of CP&L Energy and Florida Progress Corporation and who purchased the CVOs between November 30, 2000, and February 12, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to inform prospective CVO holders that the tax benefits represented as being made available to synthetic fuel producers, which were critical to the imputed value of the CVOs, would be adversely affected by the application of the alternative minimum tax.
 
A class action has been filed against the Hartford Financial Services Group (NYSE: HIG) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between November 5, 2003 and October 13, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against ConAgra Foods, Inc. (NYSE:CAG), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 18, 2003 and June 07, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against French power utility ALSTOM, SA (NYSE: ALS) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between November 17, 1998, and June 29, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.