Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

D'Arrigo Brothers Company Must Pay $13 Million to California Farm Laborers for Compulsory Travel Time

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3277 | Environmental | 03/26/2004

The court has rendered a $13+ million and verdict in a class-action filed against D'Arrigo Brothers Company on behalf of laborers, who alleged that the company failed to pay them for thousands of hours spent traveling on company vans to and from the crops they picked between 1996 and 2000. The money will not be distributed until all possible appeals have been exhausted.

The verdict allows more than 3, 000 workers to recover back wages and penalties. The reimbursement could become the biggest award of its kind since the California Supreme Court ruled in 2000 that workers must get paid for compulsory travel time. Castroville-based Sea Mist Farms, the nation's largest artichoke producer, was ordered last year to pay 37 workers more than $181,000 in travel time from 1997 to 2001.

The class-action case, whose members were primarily Mexican immigrants who earned between $11,000 and $16,000 per year, hinged on whether D'Arrigo compensated workers for half-hour commutes in company vans between a Salinas parking lot and farms throughout the Salinas valley. Workers had to arrive at the parking lot by 6 a.m., then take vans to fields 10 or 15 miles away, resulting in 25 to 50 minutes each way when they were under D'Arrigo's watch, but not getting paid. Rural workers who lived near the fields questioned why they couldn't simply arrive for work in the fields and park on the side of the road.

"I don't have a specific idea why they required this, but the result was that they didn't respect our time," said Alejandro Garcia, 39, who has cut and packed mixed lettuce for nine years. "We're the ones making the company rich, and they need to respect us."


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Environmental Cases of Interest

Accoring to a complaint filed September 28 in Illinois, oil companies tricked Congress into passing dangerous amendments to the Clean Air Act 15 years ago. The Illinois attorney that filed the proposed class action suit claims that Shell Oil, Exxon and Mobil persuaded Congress to adopt a new recipe for gasoline although the oil companies knew an ingredient would contaminate groundwater.
 
A class action has been filed against Trex Company, Inc. (NYSE:TWP), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 25, 2004 and June 22, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Lead-containing paints have been banned by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency since 1978. A class action has been filed against the Louisville, Kentucky, Housing Authority on behalf of children who were allegedly exposed to toxic levels of lead when they played on soil that the Authority knew was polluted, in violation of state and federal environmental laws.
 
More than two years after a New Jersey law firm filed a class-action lawsuit on behalf of New Jersey residents affected by the 2003 Able Energy propane explosion, a judge has cleared the way for the legal process to move forward.
 
BP, the world’s third-largest publicly traded oil company, announced on August 5, 2006 that it was indefinitely shutting down production of its pipeline in Alaska’s Prudhoe Bay oil field.
 
A class action has been filed against El Dupont, Incorporated and several of its affiliates for environmental contamination. The plaintiffs allege that their properties have been invaded by, and that they have been exposed to, hazardous substances released as a result of El Dupont's conduct at the former zinc production facility known as the Spelter Smelter facility in Harrison County, West Virginia and seek compensatory and punitive damages and the establishment of a medical monitoring program to diagnose diseases associated with the exposure of hazardous substances.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.