Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Siebel Systems Accused of Fudging Customer Satisfaction Surveys to Boost Investor Confidence

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3272 | Stocks | 02/23/2006

Several class actions have been filed against software designer Siebel Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq:SEBL) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 1, 2001, and July 17, 2002. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The action alleges that Siebel Systems executives misrepresented the company’s future business prospects by overstating customer acceptance of its new product offerings --including Siebel 7 CRM, its premiere customer relations management package-- and failed to disclose that "independent" customer satisfaction surveys that were used to persuade investors that a vast majority of the company's customers would become return software purchasers were in fact carried out by an affiliated company and could not be relied upon.

On July 17, 2002, Siebel announced its second quarter June 30, 2002, earnings reporting a precipitous drop in revenues of more than 15% and a 33% shortfall in earnings compared to consensus analyst forecasts. The company also confirmed the continuing slide in demand for its products by slashing revenue forecasts for the remainder of 2002 by an additional 25% - or $600 million below guidance provided by the defendants just six months prior. In unusually heavy volume of 65 million shares traded, Siebel Systems share prices dropped $2.13 on July 18 to close at $9.61.

If you purchased the securities issued by Siebel Systems, Inc., during the applicable period, you may request appointment by the court as a lead plaintiff if you do so by May 10, 2004. A lead plaintiff is a representative party that acts on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. In order to be appointed lead plaintiff, the court must determine that your claim is typical of the claims of other class members, and that you will adequately represent the class. Under certain circumstances, one or more class members may together serve as lead plaintiff. Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by the decision whether or not to serve as a lead plaintiff. You may retain any counsel of your choice to serve as you in this action, or you may choose to do nothing, and remain in the class as a silent member.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against BearingPoint, Inc. (NYSE:BE), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between August 14, 2003 and April 20, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. NV (CBI), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 9, 2005 and February 3, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
The parties have reached a final $8 million settlement in a class action filed against NTS Development Company. The action alleged that NTS and an affiliate company cheated investors out of millions of dollars by mismanaging limited partnerships and then repurchasing them from the investors at a deep discount, in violation of state law. Persons eligible to participate in this action should contact attorneys for the class as soon as possible.
 
Several class actions have been filed against technology company Datatec Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: DATCE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between June 26 and December 16, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
According to a press release dated April 18, 2008, on April 18, The New York Times reported that New York Attorney General Andrew M. Cuomo is investigating how auction rate securities were marketed to municipalities and public entities, and his office has subpoenaed 18 banks that underwrote and brokered auction rate securities, including Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. In addition, securities regulators from nine other states have formed a task force investigating how banks disclosed the risks of auction failures to investors, and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, working with the Securities and Exchange Commission, has initiated an inquiry into sales practices in the auction rate securities industry.
 
The parties have reached a tentative $410 million settlement in several class actions filed against defense contractor Raytheon Company (NYSE:RTN) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 28, 1999, and October 12, 1999. The actions claimed that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Persons eligible to take part in the action should contact attorneys for the class.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.