Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

California Litigation Storm Brewing against Anheuser-Busch and Miller Over Underage-Oriented Advertising

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3257 | Family | 03/22/2004

A class action has been filed against Anheuser-Busch Company and Miller Brewing Company on behalf of all current residents of the state of California who were under 21 years of age between February 3, 2000, and February 3, 2004, and who purchased alcoholic beverages manufactured by the companies during that period. The action alleges that the companies violated state unfair competition laws in the California False Advertising Act by deliberately targeting alcoholic beverage advertising to underage drinkers. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages and disgorgement of all profits wrongly made through illegal advertisement.

The action alleges that the companies both produce the type of highly sweetened flavored malt beverages that it calls ”alcopops,” which are designed specifically to appeal to young drinkers. Anheuser-Busch markets markets six of these beverages: Bacardi Silver, Bacardi Silver O, Bacardi Silver Raz,, Doc Otis’ Hard Lemon Malt Beverage, Tequiza, and Tequiza Extra. Miller also manufactures and distributes these types of beverages-- among its offerings are Jack Daniel’s Original Hard Cola, Sauza Diablo, Stolichnaya Citrona, and Skyy Blue. These drinks are attractively packaged in a way that allegedly obscures their alcoholic nature-- the action alleges that many of their bottles and labels are actually designed by the same companies that design packaging for children's drinks. This becomes apparent in the alleged fact that children ages 9 to 11 are as likely to be familiar with Budweiser's talking lizards and frogs as they are with Bugs Bunny.

The action alleges that Anheuser-Busch and Miller both intentionally exploit minors and lure them into unhealthy and potentially life-threatening addictions before they have the maturity necessary to make an informed decision whether to consume alcohol. National statistics indicate that alcohol is by far the most used and abused drug among American teenagers. According to a 1999 national survey, nearly one-third of all high school students reported hazardous drinking --more than five drinks in one sitting-- during the 30 days before the survey. The National Council on Alcoholism and Drug Dependence has found that 32% of all California 11th graders are excessive alcohol users.

The Goodwins allege that the companies have powerful economic incentives to encourage underage drinking-- citing the Journal of the American Medical Association, the action alleges that underage drinkers account for 19.7 percent of the total alcohol consumption in the United States. Using current economic indicators, this amounts to a $22.5 billion consumer expenditure on alcohol each year. The lawsuit breaks this down further: it estimates that Anheuser-Busch and Miller earn approximately $15.75 billion from underage consumption. Annual revenues of $15.75 billion multiplied by four years of misconduct amounts to roughly $63 billion in unlawful revenue from underage consumption.

There are other ways to measure the impact the allegedly illegal advertising. In 1999, 13,875 minors were arrested in California for driving while intoxicated. More than 33 percent of current vehicle-related teenage deaths in California involve the consumption of alcohol. The Journal of the American Medical Association reported in a February 26, 2003, article: "Teenage drinking can physically damage the brain; interfere with mental and social development; interrupt academic progress; increase chances of risky sexual behavior and teenage pregnancy; juvenile delinquency, and crime; compromise health; and result in unintentional injury and death."

Each year, more than 100 underage California drivers die, and thousands more are injured in alcohol-involved vehicle crashes.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Family Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed against elder care provider Sunwest Management for alleged deficiencies and failure to comply with state law.
 
The parties have reached a tentative $200,000 settlement in a class action against real estate title company Gateway Title Company on behalf of persons who, between June 11, 1995, and December 31, 2002, purchased, sold or refinanced California residential property containing one to four dwelling units in a transaction in which Gateway provided escrow services or title insurance.
 
On June 20, 2003, the court granted final approval to the parties' settlement of a class action against First Union Mortgage Company on behalf of persons who had a mortgage loan serviced by First Union as of April 1, 1998, and paid a $1 monthly fee for the receipt of a monthly mortgage statement to either First Union or Alliance Mortgage Company between April 1, 1998, and November 1, 2002. Claims must be received by July 8, 2003.
 
Low-income citizens, backed by antipoverty groups, filed a class action that challenges a federal law requiring proof of citizenship in exchange for benefits under the government's Medicaid health insurance program for the poor. Critics say the law, set to go into effect July 1, will hurt the vulnerable who may be unable to provide original documents like birth certificates. Those most in jeopardy are those in nursing homes, with mental and physical disabilities, and the victims of natural disasters.
 
A class action has been filed against Leviton Manufacturing Company, Inc. on behalf of West Virginia residents whose homes have an allegedly unsafe type of electrical outlet--a back plug-in outlet--manufactured by Leviton in violation of state consumer safety laws. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages.
 
A class action has been filed against Pass & Seymour, Inc. on behalf of South Carolina residents whose homes have an allegedly unsafe type of electrical outlet--a back plug-in outlet--manufactured by Pass & Seymour in violation of state consumer safety laws. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.