Florida Employees of Dyna-Life Products, Inc. Fight for Overtime Compensation |
 |
 |
|
|
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against Dyna-Life Products, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees, who since February 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
According to employees, Dyna-Life has engaged in a willful and intentional course of action to defraud them of proper overtime compensation. The employees claim that Dyna-Life frequently required them to work well in excess of 40 hours per week. However, according to employees, the company has no provisions in place to properly compensate employees for overtime. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act, all "non-exempt" employees are entitled to a minimum of time and a half for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week. "Non-exempt" employees are generally those that work on an hourly basis and do not have managerial or executive responsibility. The employees, who were both hourly employees and salaried inside sales associates, claim that they fit the definition of "non-exempt" and therefore entitled to receive overtime compensation for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The employees also claim that because Dyna-Life's refusal to pay overtime was willful and intentional, they are entitled to an equal amount of liquidated damages.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Employment Cases of Interest
Retirement plans are often highly complex, especially when they encompass investment programs. Several class actions have been filed against Citigroup, Inc. and its subsidiaries on behalf of former employees who allege that, from 1989 to the present, the companies induced them to buy Citigroup stock and then made them forfeit it when they left the company's employment, in violation of federal securities laws.
A class action has been filed against Rolling Frito-Lay Sales, LP by the company's California delivery drivers, who allege that Frito-Lay improperly calculated their overtime wages based on a "fluctuating work week method," which violates California law. A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Southern District Court of New York against 3795 10th Avenue Parking Corporation. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Southern District Court of Florida against SB Productions, Inc. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. Wal-Mart became the target of another class-action lawsuit, filed by advocates for workers in six countries who charged the company overlooks labor abuse at factories run by its suppliers.
The lawsuit, filed in California Superior Court in Los Angeles, lists as plaintiffs 15 workers in Bangladesh, Swaziland, Indonesia, China and Nicaragua. The lawsuit claims they were paid below minimum wage in their country, forced to work unpaid overtime and in some cases even endured beatings by supervisors. It asserts that Wal-Mart failed to enforce worker treatment provisions of its contracts with suppliers. Five North Carolina employees of commercial truckmaker Freightliner have filed a federal lawsuit against the United Auto Workers Union.
|