Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
|
Stockholders Accuse Quality Distribution of Issuing Erroneous Prospectus at IPO |
 |
 |
|
|
Several class actions have been filed against bulk transporter Quality Distribution, Inc. (Nasdaq:QLTY) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between November 7, 2003, and February 2, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. The action alleges that the prospectus that was filed in connection with Quality Distribution’s November 7, 2003, initial public offering was materially false and misleading, in that the company overstated its financial results for fiscal years 2001 through 2003. The statements were allegedly prepared without reference to generally accepted accounting principles, and thus were merely “window-dressing” to get the investing public to purchase the company’s stock. The action also alleges that the registration statement that Quality Distribution filed with the SEC was erroneous.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Stocks Cases of Interest
A class action has been filed against Brooks Automation, Inc. (BRKS), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 25, 2001 and May 22, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. On April 30, 2008, a notice of motion to appoint lead plaintiffs and lead counsels was filed by certain groups and individuals. As a result, an order granting motion to appoint lead plaintiffs and counsels was entered on April 30, 2008.
A class action has been filed against Input/Output Inc. (NYSE:IO), a TX based provider of seismic acquisition imaging technology, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between May 10, 2004 and January 4, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. On March 11, 2008, a motion to appoint certain individuals as lead plaintiffs, lead counsels and for consolidation of all related cases was filed. Just as quickly, a proposed order in regards to appointing lead plaintiffs, lead counsesl and for consolidation of all related cases was entered on March 7, 2008. As a result, an order granting motion to appoint lead plaintiffs and lead counsels was filed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on April 25, 2008.
According to a law firm press release, a class action lawsuit was filed on May 30, 2008 against Tomo Therapy, Inc.
The complaint charges TomoTherapy and certain of its officers and directors with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. TomoTherapy develops, markets, and sells the Hi-Art system, a radiation therapy system for the treatment of various types of cancers.
Several class actions have been filed against biopharmaceutical corporation Adolor Corporation (Nasdaq:ADLR) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 23, 2003, and January 14, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
|
IT'S FREE
Report
Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your
cell phone or computer to the web.
Share
Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.
Read
Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
|
|