Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

United Airlines Reaches $36.5 Million Settlement with Female Flight Attendants

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3217 | Employment | 03/04/2004

The parties have reached a $36.5 million settlement in a class action filed against United Airlines, Inc. on behalf of female flight attendants, who allege that companies use of different weight policies from male and female flight attendants between 1989 and 1994 constituted illegal sex discrimination under federal and state law. Women of the eligible to take part in the settlement who have not received notification should contact attorneys for the class immediately. Claim forms must be postmarked by March 15, 2004, to be considered valid.

There are three separate subclasses of women who may take part in the settlement. The first subclass is composed of all female flight attendants who were employed by United Airlines at any time from March 15, 1994, to August 16, 1994. The second subclass is composed of all female flight attendants who were terminated, retired, or resigned at any time after January 5, 1989, as a result of their failure to comply with United's weight requirements. The third subclass is composed of all flight attendants who timely opted into the Age Discrimination in Employment Act portion of the case.

As of February 17, 2004, almost 1,000 women had filed claims. In December 2002, the court granted preliminary approval to the settlement with United Airlines along with attorneys' fees and interest. The proceedings were stayed when United filed for bankruptcy. The parties jointly agreed to seek permission to lift the stay, which the bankruptcy court granted on November 21, 2003. The bankruptcy court will consider the settlement as a pre-petition claim that existed before United filed for Chapter 11.

From 1980 to 1994, United required female flight attendants to weigh 14 to 25 pounds less than male colleagues of the same height and age. The plaintiffs alleged that the women attempted to lose weight by various means, including severely restricting their caloric intake, using diuretics, and purging. Each of the 13 named plaintiffs, however, was disciplined and/or terminated for failing to comply with the weight requirements.

One certified class comprises all female flight attendants employed at any time between March 15, 1994, to August 16, 1994, or were employed and terminated, retired, or resigned at any time after January 5, 1989, as a result of their failure to comply with the weight requirements and did not opt out in 1994. A second class consists of flight attendants over age 40 who filed a consent to join the case under the federal Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

United agreed to pay $30 million plus 2 percent interest starting December 6, 2002, until the settlement is completely disbursed. The allocation plan provides $13.8 million in suspension back pay for class members who were suspended without pay for exceeding the weight limit. Terminated flight attendants will receive $1.6 million in post-separation back pay while constructively discharged flight attendants will receive $600,000. A $2 million general emotional distress fund will be distributed among class members who can describe how they suffered emotional distress related to the weight policy. Another $8.7 million, minus administration costs, goes to a specific emotional distress fund for members who submit records of professional treatment for medical, psychological, or other health effects.

Additionally, the United will pay $27,906 in back pay to ADEA class members who were suspended without pay. Back pay under the settlement will be considered basic compensation for purposes of calculating pension benefits and is on top of the award. Class members may submit claims under more than one plan of allocation if so eligible.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Southern District Court of Ohio against Maxim Health Systems, LLC, a health care company who employs more than 56,000 clinicians, allied health professionals, physicians and administrative personnel in cities across the US, for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments. Class members seek to recover unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, attorney's fees and costs of the litigation.
 
A purported class action lawsuit had been filed in the Northern District Court of Indiana against Indiana based retailer Homier Distributing Company, Inc., DBA Homier Mobile Merchants, for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Class members sought unpaid overtime compensation, costs and attorney’s fees.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of employees of insurance carrier Pilot Catastrophe Services, Inc. The suit alleges that the catastrophic risk insurer routinely denied overtime pay to employees who had worked hours in excess of 40 per week. The workers are seeking back overtime pay and other damages.
 
Though a business, under certain circumstances, can avoid paying overtime to managerial employees who work more than 40 hours in a normal workweek, it must be careful to stay within federal regulations. A national class action has been filed against clothier Abercrombie & Fitch Company on behalf of current and former managers and management trainees, alleging that the company violates state and federal labor laws by exempting them from overtime pay even though up to 90% of their work is the same as regular employees.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in District Court of Massachusetts against Robert Half International, Inc. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
Krispy Kreme Doughnuts, Inc. (NYSE: KKD) announced that a proposed settlement has been reached resolving an ERISA class action filed on March 3, 2005 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina against the Company and individual defendants including certain members of its Board of Directors, officers and employees. The settlement would include a one-time cash payment to be made by the Company's insurer in the amount of $4,750,000. The Company and the individual defendants deny any and all wrongdoing and would pay no money in the settlement.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.