Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Florida Asplundh Employees Seek Overtime Compensation

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3193 | Employment | 03/01/2004

A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against the Asplundh Construction Corporation. The action is brought on behalf of all Florida residents who are either currently, or have been, employed by Asplundh as hourly wage earners and who have not been paid overtime by the company for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The employees are seeking back pay, statutory damages as well as liquidated damages, injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to voluntarily "opt-in" in order to be considered a member of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.

According to employees, Asplundh routinely requires them to work in excess of 40 hours per week. However, employees claim that the international tree specialist does not have any provisions in place to pay workers proper overtime compensation under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act. Under the act, all "non-exempt" employees are entitled to a minimum of time and a half for all hours worked in excess of 40 per week. Generally, "non-exempt" workers are those who are paid on an hourly basis and do not perform managerial or executive tasks. The employees, most of which are hourly laborers, claim that they are "non-exempt" and are entitled to overtime compensation. The employees also claim that Asplundh's denial of overtime was willful and intentional, entitling them to liquidated damages in addition to back pay and statutory damages.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Eastern District Court of Texas against Cai, Inc. for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). Class members seek to recover unpaid regular wages, overtime compensation, attorney's fees and costs of the litigation.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against U.S. Pool Acquisition Corporation. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees, who since March 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
 
Price-fixing by powerful cartels occurs in unlikely-seeming places. The jury has returned a $56 million verdict in an antitrust class action filed against three Maine blueberry processing companies on behalf of Maine wild blueberry growers who directly or indirectly sold wild blueberries to them from February 28, 1996, through February 28, 2000. The money will not be distributed until all possible appeals have been exhausted.
 
A class action has been filed against Connecticut Light & Power, a CT bases utilities company, (CL&P) by two former workers who were hired as independent contractors, but allegedly treated as employees. As independent contractors, the workers did not receive benefits according to CL&P’s ERISA and non-ERISA employee benefit plans. The workers claim that their job duties were identical to actual employees of CL&P and are suing for compensatory damages and lost benefits.
 
The class has been certified in an action filed against Kmart Corporation board members and executives on behalf of current and former Kmart employees who had more than $100 million of the discount chain's stock in their 401(k) retirement plans when the company went bankrupt. The action alleges that the defendants violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act by abrogating their fiduciary duties to plan participants. Persons eligible to take part in the action should contact attorneys for the class.
 
The parties have reached a $51 million settlement in a class action filed against former WorldCom, Inc., Chief Executive Officer Bernard Ebbers and 18 ex-WorldCom officials on behalf of employees who lost hundreds of millions of dollars when the long-distance telephone company collapsed. The action alleged that the officials violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act by obtaining and retaining WorldCom stock in the company's 401(k) plans even though they knew of WorldCom's financial problems. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the attorneys for the class for more information.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.