Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Body Armor Purchasers Claim Zylon is Defective

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3185 | Consumer Products | 07/03/2006

Multiple class actions have been filed in various states against the Toyobo Company, LTD. and Second Chance Body Armor, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents who purchased bullet proof vests from Second Chance which contained Zylon, a fiber manufactured by Toyobo. The purchasers allege that vests which contain Zylon are defective and degrade over time, rendering them not usable for their intended purpose. Purchasers are seeking compensatory and punitive damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.

According to the purchasers, Second Chance uses the fiber known as Zylon in the manufacture of its bullet proof vests. Zylon, which is manufactured by the Toyobo Company and supplied to Second Chance, is allegedly defective in several ways. The purchasers claim that Zylon breaks down through exposure to heat and humidity, flexing through normal use, wear, light and care. According to the purchasers, this renders the vests manufactured by Second Chance as ineffective for their intended purpose, which is stopping bullets.

The purchasers allege that both Toyobo and Second Chance knew that Zylon was susceptible to degradation and lost its protective qualities, but did not inform purchasers, whose lives were at stake, of these defects. The purchasers allege that Second Chance has sold thousands, if not tens of thousands, of these vests to law enforcement personnel and average citizens throughout the U.S. and should have taken steps to remedy the alleged potentially deadly defects in these vests.

Class-action lawsuits in West Virginia, Missouri, Louisiana, New Jersey, California and Michigan were consolidated into the Oklahoma class-action, which settlement was announced on July 13, 2005. Toyobo Co. is paying $29 million to settle the consolidated class-action lawsuit in the United States that had demanded damages from the Japanese textile manufacturer for bulletproof vests suspected of defects.

Members of the class potentially include individuals, municipalities and police agencies across the country who wore or paid for the vest. The case involves some 150,000 bullet-resistant vests.

Toyobo and Second Chance have blamed each other. Toyobo says the problem was caused by the design and production of the vests, not the Zylon material. 'Toyobo supplies eight other companies with Zylon for bulletproof vests, and there hasn't been a single accident in the other vests' a Toyobo official stated.

Toyobo offered the settlement because it wanted to avoid a long legal fight and to deal responsibly with the possibly defective vests. Under the settlement, the plaintiffs can buy bulletproof vests from Armor Holdings Inc. at a discount.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest

On November 17, 2004, the Court approved the proposed settlement in a class action that had been filed against the San Diego Association of Realtors, the North San Diego Association of Realtors, the Pacific Southwest Association of Realtors, Incorporated, the East San Diego County Association of Realtors, Incorporated, the Coronado Association of Realtors and Sandicor, Incorporated for charging smaller realtors higher fees to a multiple listing service (MLS) than larger firms from 1990 to the present.
 
A Kansas law firm has filed a class-action lawsuit against DaimlerChrysler Corp. over what it claims is a problem with many Jeep Grand Cherokees. KMBC reported that the lawsuits were filed in Jackson County and Johnson County, Kan., over alleged problems with the front brakes on 1999 through 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokees. The lawsuits allege that after as little as 5,000 miles, the steering wheel and front wheels "shake" and that drivers encounter severe vibrations through the steering wheel, floor, seat and pedals when the brakes are applied. DaimlerChrysler has never issued a recall for a problem with the front brakes. The lawsuits seek to force the carmaker to reimburse Kansas and Missouri residents for all costs spent repairing the brakes. ClassActionAmerica is seeking additional information about this case now and will provide it as soon as it becomes available.
 
A U.S. district judge recently certified a national class-action lawsuit brought by a Detroit businessman against Illinois-based Caterpillar Inc. over diesel engines the company makes for large yachts.
 
The HomeTeam Pest Defense Company, a subsidiary of Centex Corporation, provides built-in home pest treatments through a tubes-in-the-wall or tubes-in-the-floor pest defense system. However, some individuals who have the tubes-in-the-wall or tubes-in-the-floor pest defense system have found it to be an ineffective system. Independent tests of the tubes-in-the-wall or tubes-in-the-floor pest defense system have also questioned the effectiveness of the system. Our office is currently investigating the tubes-in-the-wall or tubes-in-the-floor pest defense system. If you have this system in your home and believe that it is not working, please call to speak with a lawyer about our investigation at 1-866-467-1400, ext. 100, or you can make a claim on this page.
 
Several class actions have been filed against nutritional supplement manufacturer NBTY, Inc., (NYSE: NTY) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 22, 2004, and June 16, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
Sex sells, even if your product is bogus. A nationwide class action has been filed against Berkeley Premium Nutraceuticals, Inc. on behalf of purchasers of the popular male enhancement product Enzyte, who allege that the company uses false and deceptive advertisements with phony statistics to lure naïve consumers in violation of state consumer protection laws.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.