Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
|
Indiana Residents Challenge Statewide Credit Association's Collection Practices |
 |
 |
|
|
A statewide class action has been filed in Indiana against debt collection specialists, Statewide Credit Association, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all Indiana residents who received form type collection letters from Statewide with language that overshadowed the federally mandated information regarding consumers' rights to dispute the validity of the debts which are under collection. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory, injunctive and declaratory relief.
According to consumers, Statewide has violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practice Act through the use of misleading and deceptive form type collection letters. According to consumers, Statewide's letters include language that is confusing a deceptive. Consumers allege that Statewide sent them a follow up letter in less than 30 days after their initial communication that stated an immediate need for consumers to contact their creditor regarding the debt. The letters stated that it was assumed that the debt was valid, but in the event that there was a legitimate reason to dispute the debt, consumers were obligated to do so immediately. Under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, any person or entity attempting to collect a debt is obligated to inform the debtor of his or her right to dispute the validity of the debt within 30 days. Consumers have the right to dispute the validity of the debt for any reason, legitimate or otherwise. This information must be provided to consumers within five days of any initial communication, and is generally provided within the initial communication. By sending a follow up letter to consumers less than 30 days after the initial communication, and by stating that the validity of debts could only be disputed for legitimate reasons, the consumers allege Statewide's actions were confusing and deceptive. According to consumers, these actions overshadowed the required notice regarding validity and diminished its importance. Consumers claim that Statewide has sent thousands, if not tens of thousands of these form letters and that the class is, therefore, potentially very numerous.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest
A national class action has been filed in California against internet giant, Yahoo!, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents who have purchased credit repair services from Yahoo!, known as "Yahoo! Credit Manager." The action is brought under the federal Credit Repair Organizations Act as well as common law contract and seeks compensatory, punitive and statutory damages as well as disgorgement of profits, injunctive relief and the establishment of a constructive trust. A letter was sent out last July or August about the theft of personal and financial information by an employee at Certegy Check Services, Inc. A settlement has now been reached about that theft. A statewide class action has been filed in Missouri against Greensboro Home Equity, Inc. and Household Financial Services, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all Missouri residents who borrowed money from Greensboro or Household where the promissory note contained a pre-payment penalty in excess of 2% of the loan value or which assessed any prepayment penalty more than five years after the closing date of the loan. The action is brought under Missouri consumer protection law and seeks compensatory, statutory and punitive damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. A class action has been filed against debt collector Caldeway Properties, Inc. on behalf of individuals who received collection letters from Caldeway containing language alleged to violate the fair debt collection practices act. The case seeks actual and punitive damages, attorney’s fees and costs. Do you ever feel swamped by all those pre-approved credit card offers that show up in your mailbox? On November 22, 2004 the court granted final approval to the settlement agreement submitted by the parties in a class action that had been filed against Fleet Bank (R.I.), N.A. on behalf consumers who alleged that the credit card issuer mislead them by promising a "fixed" low interest rate on its credit cards and then raising the rate just one year later in violation of state unfair trade practices laws and the federal Truth in Lending Act. The action sought unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.
On June 20, 2003, the court granted final approval to the parties' settlement of a class action against First Union Mortgage Company on behalf of persons who had a mortgage loan serviced by First Union as of April 1, 1998, and paid a $1 monthly fee for the receipt of a monthly mortgage statement to either First Union or Alliance Mortgage Company between April 1, 1998, and November 1, 2002. Claims must be received by July 8, 2003.
|
IT'S FREE
Report
Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your
cell phone or computer to the web.
Share
Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.
Read
Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
|
|