California Residents Target Encore Receivable Management's Collection Practices |
 |
 |
|
|
A statewide class action has been filed in California against collection specialist, Encore Receivable Management, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all California residents who received a collection letter from Encore which offered to settle their alleged debt for a lesser amount, if payment was made immediately. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
This action arises from the alleged policy of Encore in which they include in their collection letters an offer to settle the outstanding debt for a reduced rate. The settlement offer is, according to the letters, a limited offer, requiring immediate payment. According to consumers, this offer is misleading and deceptive because Encore is allegedly always prepared to negotiate a settlement for a lesser amount. Thus, the language requiring immediate action is claimed to be deceptive to consumers because they are given the impression that they need to act immediately in order to have an opportunity to discharge the debt at a reduced rate. The consumers claim that this has a coercive effect, limiting their ability to challenge the validity of the debt and limiting their ability to make an informed decision about the debt.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest
A class action lawsuit has been filed against Option One Mortgage Corp., a subsidiary of H&R Block, by consumers who received stated income mortgage loans. The complaint alleges that these creditors were charged pre-payment penalties that violated federal lending laws. The plaintiffs seek a refund of the penalties and other damages. An anti-trust class-action lawsuit has been filed against Visa, Mastercard and several major U.S. banks on behalf of merchants, alleging the fixing of credit card fees. A class action covering California and New York has been filed in New York against collection specialists Forster & Garbus. The action is brought on behalf of all California and New York residents who received form type collection letters from Forster & Garbus which offered to settle the consumers' alleged debt for a lesser amount. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. A statewide class action has been filed in Pennsylvania against Nationwide Collections, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all Pennsylvania residents who received alleged misleading "form" type collection letters from Nationwide. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. On June 20, 2003, the court granted final approval to the parties' settlement of a class action against First Union Mortgage Company on behalf of persons who had a mortgage loan serviced by First Union as of April 1, 1998, and paid a $1 monthly fee for the receipt of a monthly mortgage statement to either First Union or Alliance Mortgage Company between April 1, 1998, and November 1, 2002. Claims must be received by July 8, 2003. Debt collection letters must comply with the federal Fair Debt Collections Act or the collector may find himself or herself owing more than the recipients of the letters. A class action has been certified against municipal debt collector Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd. on behalf of all persons who, between January 1, 2002, and March 31, 2003, received communications from Portnoff relating to municipal claims for water and sewer assessments asserted by the city of Bethlehem.
|