Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Alaskan Senior Citizens File Suit to Force State to Continue Longevity Bonus Program

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3088 | Government | 01/26/2004

A class action has been filed against the state of Alaska and its governor, Frank Murkowski, on behalf of Alaskan senior citizens who allege that the state made a legal obligation to Alaskan seniors when it created the Longevity Bonus program in 1972, and when it agreed to phase out the program in 1993—an obligation that can’t be crossed out with a line-item veto pen. The action seeks an order that will reinstate the program for those recipients who are currently eligible for bonus checks.

The action alleges that the promise amounts to a contract, and the governor's line-item veto of the $46 million program last year does not exempt the state from its legal obligation. The bonus apparently provided some 18,000 seniors with payments averaging something over $2,500 per year.

Helen Simpson, 84, of Anchorage, is one of the plaintiffs named in the lawsuit. She alleges that the governor's action betrays those who have become dependent on the monthly checks. The action translates her anger into legal arguments that could test the governor's line-item veto authority.

Since the state legislature never got rid of the program, a court order overturning the veto would essentially restart it. The governor’s action merely crossed off the money for it in the budget— it is still authorized in state law, just not funded. Restarting the program would mean a continuing cost to the state of $46 million a year, which would diminish as participants in the program pass away.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Government Cases of Interest

The government may only prosecute and punish persons to the extent that the laws allow— no further. A class action has been filed against the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia on behalf of all underage persons who have been arrested, subjected to search and seizure, handcuffed, booked, or otherwise detained for violations of Washington D.C.’s criminal statute against underage possession of alcohol on or after April 9, 1997. The action alleges that, on that date, the statute was amended so that it no longer provides for any criminal penalties, yet police and prosecutors continue making false arrests and maliciously filing criminal charges as though it did.
 
Under certain circumstances, corporations may be authorized to collect taxes on behalf of municipalities. The class has been certified in a class action filed against Nextel West Corporation on behalf of Nextel customers residing in Illinois and 16 other states, alleging that by collecting municipality taxes in unincorporated areas, the company violates the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act.
 
A Kentucky attorney filed a lawsuit against the way the Boone County Property Valuation Administrator's (PVA) office assesses property for taxation.
 
The U.S. Constitution protects us from unreasonable searches and seizures. The parties have reached a tentative settlement of nearly $7 million in an action filed against St. Croix County, Wisconsin, and several individual defendants on behalf of prisoners who were strip-searched in the county's jail between 1996 and 2001. Persons who are eligible to participate in the settlement should contact class counsel for more information.
 
A class action has been filed against the United States Postal Service on behalf of employees who allege that the Service systematically and purposefully altered their electronic timeslips to avoid paying them overtime, in violation of the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, the Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), and the Privacy Act of 1974. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. Qualified employees should join the action as soon as possible to prevent forfeiture of benefits because of the operation of federal statutory deadlines.
 
The Department of Veterans Affairs faces two class-action lawsuits related to the theft of information on 26.5 million veterans that occurred in May, 2006. The Vietnam Veterans of America (VVA) and four other veterans groups have filed a class-action lawsuit against the VA seeking $1,000 in damages for each veteran who can show that he or she has been harmed by the data theft.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.