|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 3069 | Technology | 01/20/2004
The class has been certified in an action filed against Cox Communications of New Orleans, Inc. on behalf of all current and former residential subscribers of Cox cable television service in Orleans, Jefferson, St. Charles, and St. Bernard Parishes who have been assessed or who have paid a late fee to Cox in connection with their cable television service. The action alleges that the fees are unreasonable and bears no relationship to the actual cost Cox incurs when a subscriber pays a bill late, in violation of state law. Class members do not need to take any action to remain eligible.
The class excludes all bulk cable subscribers. Inquiries regarding the action should be directed to: Cox Cable Late Fee Litigation A trial has been scheduled in the matter for April 5, 2004. At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Technology Cases of Interest Federal securities laws and regulations protect innocent stockholders from unfair dealing by powerful corporate figures. The parties have reached a tentative $11 million settlement of several class actions filed against electronic data interchange provider Envoy Corporation (formerly Nasdaq: ENVY) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between February 12, 1997, and August 18, 1998. To recover under the settlement, a completed proof of claim postmarked no later than February 20, 2004, must be mailed to the claims administrator. Several class actions have been filed against technology company Mobility Electronics, Inc. (Nasdaq: MOBE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 2, 2003, and January 5, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Several class actions have been filed against flash memory manufacturer Lexar Media, Inc. (Nasdaq:LEXR) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 17, 2003, and April 16, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Several class actions have been filed against networking company Nortel Networks Corporation (NYSE:NT) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 23, 2003, and March 12, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Several class actions have been filed against technology company Micromuse, Inc. (Nasdaq: MUSEE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 20, 2000, and December 29, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A class action has been filed against Citadel Security Software Inc. (NASDAQ: CDSS), a TX based provider of technology for security systems, and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company’s common stock between February 12 2004 and December 16, 2004. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company’s securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. |
IT'S FREE
|
Class Action Lawsuit Center ||
Product Recall Center ||
Consumer Complaint Center ||
About LawCash
Link Exchange
Privacy Policy ||
Legal Policies ||
Terms & Conditions ||
Website Advertising Policy ||
Site Map ||
Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
