Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Indiana Consumers Furious Over Debt Collection Practices

Report Fraud
Case ID: 3052 | Credit / Debt | 01/12/2004

A statewide class action, with possible national reach, has been filed in Indiana against Collection Specialists, Inc., collection attorney Alan R. Miller, Saint John's Health System and its director of accounts receivable, Philip D. Hilger. The action is brought on behalf of all individuals who have been subject to alleged illegal, intimidating, misleading and deceptive collection practices on the part of the named collectors. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Indiana state law on statutory deception and breach of contract and the federal Racketeer Influenced
and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act and seeks actual, enhanced, treble and statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.

This action arises from the alleged unfair, deceptive, misleading and illegal collection practices engaged in by the named collectors. According to the
consumers, the collectors have engaged in a systematic practice that violates both state and federal law. The core allegation made by consumers is that
the collectors have conspired to assess illegal fees in their efforts to collect debts from consumers and have engaged in intimidating and harassing practices, including the filing of unwarranted civil actions against consumers. Specifically, for the claim filed under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, the consumers allege that Collection Specialists and Alan Miller in charging what are in effect, flat rate fees in their efforts to collect debts for St. John’s, are violating the Act because they charged fees that were far in excess of actual reasonable costs. Under the Act, such fees as postage, copying, telephone service, mileage and similar costs are permitted. However, the consumers allege that both Collection Specialists and Mr. Miller added fees in excess of $400 each, clearly eclipsing the fees that would have been incurred and permitted under the act.

Consumers also allege that St. John's, the original creditor in this matter, violated Indiana law by intentionally misrepresenting the amount of debts when assigning such debts to professional debt collectors, such as Collection Specialists and Mr. Miller. According to consumers, when St. John's assigns debts to collectors, they intentionally add a collection fee that is not part of the outstanding principal debt. This has the effect of misleading third parties, who may be attempting to assist in collecting the debt, into believing that the principal is higher than it actually is. This also is transferred to consumers, who are presented with unlawful fees when collection attempts are made. Under Indiana law, any false or misleading written statement made in an effort obtain money constitutes actionable deception. These actions also, according to the consumers, constitute a breach of contract under Indiana law.

The consumers final allegation is that these activities amount to racketeering under the Federal RICO statute. The consumers assert that the collectors compose an enterprise operating in Indiana which consists in one part of St. John's and its agent Mr. Hilger, and in another part of Collection Specialists as a debt collection agency and their attorney, Mr. Miller. The consumers allege that these parties are associated in fact, act in concert, and engage in activities aimed at furthering each other's financial interests. Through the U.S. Mail, the consumers claim that the collectors forward false, misleading, deceptive and fraudulent notices to consumers. This allegedly constitutes, according to the consumers, mail fraud. The consumers claim that the repetitive nature of these actions brings the collectors conduct into the realm of organized racketeering.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest

A statewide class action has been filed in Indiana against collection specialists Weltman, Weinberg & Reis, Co. LPA. The action is brought on behalf of all Indiana consumers who, since May 6, 2003, received form type collection letters from Weltman, Weinberg that contained a caption resembling a civil complaint, when in fact none had been filed. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania against Steinberg, Fineo, Berger & Fischoff, PC for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) which prohibits debt collectors from engaging in abusive, deceptive and unfair collection practices. Class members seek an injunction specifying that the defendant cease communication with her, damages, reasonable attorney’s fees and cost of the litigation.
 
A national class action has been filed in New York against collection agency DPL Associates Ltd on behalf of all consumers who have received collection letters from DPL that require consumers to dispute the validity of the debt in writing or do not give the consumer the name and contact information for the creditor that has employed DPL to pursue the debt. The consumers claim that these letters violate the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
 
Under federal law, a consumer who receives unsolicited merchandise is entitled to keep it without paying for it. The parties have reached a tentative settlement in a class action against book publisher and marketer Oxmoor House, Inc. on behalf of all persons who allege that they were sent unsolicited books and charged for them, or charged for books that they did not receive, in violation of the federal Unordered Merchandise stature, and Florida's deceptive trade practices and unfair collections laws. The legal notice describing the class action does not state the deadline for filing claims under the settlement.
 
California law requires that mortgage companies fully disclose all charges and fees related to the origination of a residential loan. On July 28, 2003, the court granted final approval to the parties' $12.6+ million settlement in a class action against AccuBanc Mortgage Corporation and National City Mortgage Company on behalf of all persons who paid document preparation, documentation or document processing fees, processing fees, administrative fees, underwriting fees or wire fees to either or both of the companies in connection with the origination of a residential mortgage in California between May 3, 1996, and April 21, 2003.
 
A class action has been filed against Community Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Utah (CCCS) by the Utah Division of Consumer Protection, on behalf of consumers who have taken part in CCCS’ debt management services. The lawsuit alleges that CCCS violated the Utah Credit Services Organization Act and the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.