Ohio Telemarketers Allege Smart Choice Marketing Failed to Pay Overtime |
 |
 |
|
|
A combination class action/collective action has been filed in Ohio against the telemarketing service, Smart Choice Marketing, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all Ohio residents who are currently, or were employed by Smart Choice from December 1, 2000, to the present as hourly telemarketers and whose working time was tracked and recorded by the use of the computer dialer and who were not paid overtime compensation as a result. The action alleges that Smart Choice engaged in an intentional and systematic course of conduct which was aimed at denying its hourly employees proper overtime compensation. The action is brought as a class action under Ohio Minimum Fair Wage Standards Law and as a collective action under the federal Fair Labor Standards Law. The employees are seeking back pay, liquidated and statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the case. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.
Smart Choice is an Ohio telemarketing company that offers home equity loans to consumers. The employees who bring this action allege that Smart Choice tracks their hours in two ways, first through the use of a standard time clock, and second through the use of their computer workstations which tracks the amount of time they are before their computer and logged in. According to the employees, Smart Choice uses the information provided by the computer to calculate hours worked. The employees allege that only time in which they are at their workstation and logged into their computers is credited as time worked. The employees claim that they are required to log off every time they leave their workstation and that as a result, they often have to work as much as ten hours a day to be credited with an eight hour day. According to the employees, they are entitled to pay for all hours worked, not just the hours they are logged in to the computer. They allege that Smart Choice refuses to credit them for hours recorded by the traditional time clock and that as a result Smart Choice has violated both Ohio labor laws and the Fair Labor Standards Act which both require pay at the rate of time and a half for all hours worked beyond 40 weekly.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Employment Cases of Interest
African American employees who work as managers for the Sodexho Marriott corporation have brought a class action against the food service industry giant, alleging racial discrimination in the company's promotion process. Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC is investigating the financial losses suffered by employees and former employees of Zale Corporation (NYSE:ZLC) who participated in the company's 401(k) plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). A class action lawsuit has been filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida against Keramac Management. The case involves violations of federal labor law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. Music retailer Guitar Center Inc. has reached a preliminary agreement to settle two purported class action lawsuits filed by hourly store employees in California. The suits alleged, among other things, that the company improperly documented and enforced break-time and lunchtime periods for the workers. Wal-Mart faces yet another lawsuit filed by employees, this time lawyers claim that retail giant Wal-Mart has broken Massachusetts law more than 1 (m) million times by shortchanging workers. A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against J&B Today's, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former hourly employees of all Florida J&B Today's stores, who since May 2001, were not paid proper statutory overtime for all hours worked beyond 40 per week. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential class members.
|