Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Sealed Air Corporation Allegedly Failed to Account for Potential Asbestos Liability

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2929 | Stocks | 08/30/2004

A class action has been filed against packaging materials manufacturer Sealed Air Corporation (NYSE: SEE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between March 27, 2000, and July 30, 2002. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.

The action alleges that, during this time period, the defendants materially (1) misled the investing public, (2) artificially inflated the price of Sealed Air's common stock by publicly issuing false and misleading statements and (3) violated Generally Accepted Accounting Principles by failing to accrue for the company's contingent liability for asbestos claims arising from past operations of W.R. Grace & Co.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

An anti-trust class-action lawsuit has been filed against Visa, Mastercard and several major U.S. banks on behalf of merchants, alleging the fixing of credit card fees.
 
According to a law firm press release, a class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of all persons who purchased the securities of Fifth Third Bancorp against the Company and its president and chief executive officer, alleging violations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
Kahn Gauthier Swick, LLC ("KGS"), the law firm that filed the first class action lawsuit against Optionable, Inc. ("Optionable" or the "Company") (OTC BB:OPBL.OB), notifies investors that a subsequent class action lawsuit filed by a Connecticut and New York law firm has been voluntarily dismissed. Following this untimely withdrawal, KGS remains the sole law firm actively prosecuting a securities class action lawsuit seeking to recover for losses suffered by shareholders who purchased shares of the Company in connection with its Initial Public Offering ("IPO") in or about May 9, 2005, or who purchased shares thereafter in the open market (the "Class Period"). KGS’ lawsuit is pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Civil Action No. 07cv3753.
 
Several class actions have been filed against container shipping company CP Ships, Ltd. (NYSE:TEU), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 23, 2003, and August 6, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
According to a law firm press release dated September 5, 2008, a class action complaint has been filed against the company and certain current and former officers and directors. The Complaint alleges violations of Section 11 and Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, including allegations of material misrepresentations and omissions in Quest's Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the Initial Public Offering ("IPO") on November 7, 2007. The class period begins with the IPO on November 7, 2007 and continues through August 25, 2008.
 
Two class action cases have been filed in San Diego Superior Court against strip mall developer Price Legacy Corporation (Nasdaq: PLRE) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders. The actions claim that the defendants breached their fiduciary duty to stockholders in a recent merger with PL Retail LLC. Specifically, the stockholders claim that PL Retail did not pay fair value when it acquired Price Legacy and that Price legacy should have held out for a better price.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.