Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

PMA Capital Allegedly Failed to Maintain Proper Loss Reserves

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2901 | Stocks | 07/26/2004

A class action has been filed against insurance holding company PMA Capital Corporation (Nasdaq: PMACA) and certain of its officers and directors by investors who purchased the company's securities between November 13, 1998 and November 3, 2003. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The investors seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their investments.

The action alleges that, during this time period, PMA represented that it had established adequate loss reserves to pay or settle losses arising from insurance claims made by PMA policy holders, and that any estimated claims were revised according to the availability of new information. Allegedly, the defendants painted this portrait of success to create favorable conditions for PMA to complete two offerings of convertible senior debentures and monthly income senior notes during the time period, valued at $75 million and $50 million, respectively. In addition, the defendants allegedly sought to obtain positive ratings from insurance industry rating agencies which would enable the company to underwrite insurance policies and negotiate reinsurance treaties, worth millions of dollars in premiums, to purchasers who relied on such ratings as a measurement of PMA's capital structure.

Unbeknownst to class members, however, PMA's seeming success was the product, allegedly, of the defendants' failure to properly account for the company's liabilities and expenses arising from insurance claims reported by policy holders for which PMA failed to establish adequate reserves. As a result, during this time period, the defendants allegedly understated PMA's liabilities and expenses, thereby artificially inflating PMA's reported results.

On November 4, 2003, before the market opened, PMA disclosed, in a press release and a concurrent SEC filing on Form 8-K, that it would record a pre-tax charge of $150 million primarily to compensate for inadequate loss reserves maintained by its subsidiary, PMA Re. The defendants stated that an internal review of the company's reserves revealed that the material charge "relates to higher than expected underwriting losses in PMA Re's reinsurance operations, primarily from casualty business written in accident years 1997 to 2000."

As a result of this charge, PMA suspended its common stock dividend and has engaged Banc of America Securities LLC to explore "strategic alternatives." On the same day, PMA announced that it was in discussions with Pennsylvania Insurance Department over the company's insurance operations. Immediately following this announcement, the price of PMA common stock plummeted $8.11, or 61.7 percent, from its previous day's trading, to close at $5.03 per share. On November 6, PMA revealed that the write-down would effectively force the company to withdraw from the reinsurance business, and that defendant John W. Smithson had resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of PMA.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against St. Jude Medical, Inc. (STJ), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 25, 2006 and April 4, 2006. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina against Parkdale America, LLC. The case involves antitrust litigation. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
Several class actions have been filed against technology company Wave Systems Corporation (Nasdaq: WAVX) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 31, 2003, and February 2, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
On April 07, 2008, several motions were filed by certain groups and individuals for the appointment of lead plaintiffs and to approve the selection of lead counsels. Just as quickly, several proposed orders granting the above mentioned motions were also entered at the same time. As the case progresses, several responses from the competing motions for the appointment of lead plaintiffs and counsels were filed on May 14, 2008. The judge finally made its order granting the Public Funds Group, the Cobb County Government Employees' Pension Plan, the Dekalb County Pension Plan, and the Mississippi Public Employees Retirement System to be appointed as lead plaintiffs and counsels. The case was quickly followed by a proposed order entered on May 23, 2008 in regards to the consolidation of cases filed by the Public Funds Group. As a result, a stipulation and order to consolidate cases was entered on May 28, 2008.
 
A class action has been filed against Tibco Software, Inc. (NasdaqNM:TIBX), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between September 21, 2004 and March 01, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Western District Court of Missouri against Thomas A. Brown for violations of the Investment Company Act. Class members seek compensatory damages, disgorgement of the fees paid to the investment advisors and punitive damages.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.