|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 2899 | Credit / Debt | 07/26/2004
A class action has been filed in Maryland against Ocwen Federal Bank FSB on behalf of all mortgage borrowers who, since October 23, 1991, have been charged allegedly unlawful inspection fees by Ocwen. Consumers allege that Ocwen has violated state consumer debt collection and commercial laws and has breached its contract with consumers. Consumers are seeking compensatory, statutory and punitive damages, declaratory relief and a permanent injunction and the disgorgement of funds obtained through unjust enrichment.
This action is the result of what Maryland consumers claim is the charging of unlawful inspection fees on mortgage loans held and serviced by Ocwen Federal Bank. According to consumers, these fees are not permitted by Maryland law, nor are they a part of the mortgage contract between Ocwen and consumers. These fees were collected by Ocwen as part of loan payments made by consumers. The class members allege that the collection of these fees resulted in Ocwen's unjust enrichment. The consumers also allege that Ocwen may have been charging other prohibited fees, but the complaint does not specify these fees. This case was originally filed in state court and was removed to federal court by Ocwen. It is expected that the consumers will amend the action to include violations of federal laws as well. At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest A class action lawsuit has been filed against AT&T Wireless Services, Inc. on behalf of wireless phone subscribers who requested termination of their wireless accounts and were then improperly charged an "adjustment" or other fees for services after the effective date of the termination. The suit seeks actual damages, as well as statutory and punitive damages, on behalf of the plaintiffs. A national class action has been filed in New York against collection agency DPL Associates Ltd on behalf of all consumers who have received collection letters from DPL that require consumers to dispute the validity of the debt in writing or do not give the consumer the name and contact information for the creditor that has employed DPL to pursue the debt. The consumers claim that these letters violate the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
A statewide class action has been filed in Indiana against attorney Lawrence Reuben and the Law Offices of Lawrence Reuben. The action is brought on behalf of all Indiana consumers who, since January 21, 2003, have received a collection letter from Reuben or his law office which did not include the federally mandated language regarding consumers' rights to dispute the validity of the debt being collected. The action is brought under the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. Customers of several popular online retailers, including Fandango.com, Priceline.com and Staples.com were victims of an alleged Internet scheme in which their credit cards were charged a monthly fee for a "discount club" membership they had never requested, according to a class action lawsuit filed in US District Court in Massachusetts. The Federal Trade Commission announced that it had reached a $15 million settlement with ChoicePoint Inc., the commercial data broker that disclosed last February that thieves had duped the company into turning over private data on more than 145,000 people. A class action has been filed on behalf of consumers who purchased the “Thinking 21C” program from education and consulting services provider/retailer Stratia Group. The complaint alleges that Stratia claimed that “Thinking 21C”, a collection of DVD’s and associated counseling services, would “open the eyes of purchasers to the way the world really works”. The program promised to reveal “intricacies and loopholes” that purchasers could use to eliminate debt and increase wealth. Plaintiffs contend that in fact, after purchasing the program, Stratia provided bogus and fraudulent debt counseling services that had the effect of dramatically worsening the plaintiff’s debt and credit problems. Plaintiffs seek damages of 2.25 million per count in the eight count complaint, together with treble punitive damages. |
IT'S FREE
|
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
