New York Internet Customers Claim DSL Service from Bell Atlantic/Verizon Communications Didn't Measure Up |
 |
 |
|
|
The class has been certified in an action filed against Bell Atlantic Corporation (now known as Verizon Communications, Inc.) on behalf of New York customers who subscribed to the telephone company's high-speed Internet service. The action alleges that Bell Atlantic violated New York's consumer protection statutes by mis-advertising its Digital Subscriber Line, or DSL, service. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. Bell Atlantic began offering DSL service in 1999, allegedly advertising the new service as fast, reliable, easy to install and easy to use. Allegedly, the company claimed that its DSL service was up to 126 times faster than a 56K modem and would provide uninterrupted service, allowing customers to use the phone and the Internet simultaneously--and it hawked its technical support as "unbelievable." Bell Atlantic Corporation later was renamed Verizon Communications, Inc. after a corporate merger.
The action alleges that Bell Atlantic was unprepared to meet initial customer demand and its customers paid the price. As a result of the onslaught of new customers and lack of infrastructure, the company's DSL service allegedly was occasionally even slower than a 56K modem and suffered numerous interruptions for hours and sometimes days.
The action alleges that technical support was also extraordinarily shoddy. Allegedly, the company did not train its employees in installation techniques and support strategies. Customers were allegedly forced to wait for a half hour on hold before being connected to a service representative, and sometimes much longer.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Technology Cases of Interest
Several class actions have been filed against flash memory manufacturer Lexar Media, Inc. (Nasdaq:LEXR) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between July 17, 2003, and April 16, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Enterasys Networks Inc. (NYSE: ETS) announced today that it has entered into an agreement in principle to settle shareholder litigation filed in 1997 against its predecessor, Cabletron Systems, Inc., and certain Cabletron directors and officers. The settlement, which is subject to execution of a final settlement agreement and subsequent court approval, is expected to be signed by the parties on or before January 25, 2005. Several class actions have been filed against Chinese e-commerce company World Information Technology, Inc. (OTC BB:WRLT.PK), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 3, 2003, and March 16, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. Direcway is a broadband internet provider that offers high speed connection and access to the internet for home, business and government. Direcway utilizes a satellite connection to provide broadband service, through both Mac and Windows operating systems, that does not require dial up or phone lines across the contiguous United States. Direcway also provides and administers free email/ web mail accounts. The class action lawsuit was filed July 15, 2005 by New York attorneys on behalf of purchasers of shares in game publisher Majesco seeking monetary compensation. The lawsuit alleges violations of the federal securities laws by Majesco Entertainment Company and certain of its officers and/or directors. The lawsuit is on behalf of purchasers of the securities of Majesco Entertainment Company (NASDAQ: COOL) between December 8, 2004 to July 12, 2005, inclusive (the "Class Period") seeking monetary compensation under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The parties have reached a tentative settlement apparently valued at $681,000 in an action filed against maker of McAfee software products, Network Associates, Inc., on behalf of all U.S. residents who purchased McAfee VirusScan version 3 or 4. The action alleged that Network Associates promised to provide perpetual updates to its software, and failed to do so. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement have until July 16, 2004, to avail themselves of a free download of McAfee software.
|