DaimlerChrysler Allegedly Failed to Assist Disabled Readers in Job Application Process |
 |
The federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has filed an enforcement action against DaimlerChrysler AG on behalf of cognitively-impaired job applicants who allege that the company failed to provide readers for them in violation of the federal Americans with Disabilities Act. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages. The job applicants suffer from various cognitive impairments that limit their ability to learn, read, and comprehend written materials. DaimlerChrysler allegedly refused to provide persons to assist with the applicants' reading tasks during the application process for at least two workers who were applying for manufacturing positions that did not require significant reading skills. The action alleges that the company then refused to hire them based on their inability to complete the application process.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Employment Cases of Interest
A nationwide class action has been filed in Ohio against supermarket giant, The Kroger Company. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former employees of Kroger whose health insurance was either reduced or cancelled while on medical leave or who were not reinstated to their previous position once they returned from medical leave. The action is brought under the federal Family Medical Leave Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. Just because you are classified as a managerial worker does not mean that you might not qualify for overtime pay. The parties have reached a tentative $3.5 million settlement in an action filed against Borders, Inc. (apparently the proper defendant should have been the Borders Group, Inc.) on behalf of assistant managers who worked in California Borders Bookstores between April 10, 1996, and March 18, 2001. Eligible persons should contact the class attorneys for more information. Federal law protects workers from unexpected job losses due to surprise layoffs. A class action has been filed against theme park owner Florida Cypress Gardens, Inc. on behalf of former employees who allege that they were laid off without the proper 60 days' notice in violation of the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act.
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Western District Court of New York against NVR, Inc. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. A close look into the "medical malpractice crisis" will show that insurance companies, not lawyers, are to blame. Three related class actions have been filed against the General Reinsurance Corporation, Reciprocal of America, accounting firms PricewaterhouseCoopers and Milliman U.S.A., and numerous other malpractice insurance providers on behalf of attorneys, doctors and hospitals who bought malpractice insurance from the insurers. The action alleges that the malpractice insurers conspired with their reinsurer Reciprocal of America, which in turn conspired with General Reinsurance to misrepresent Reciprocal's financial health, in violation of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act.
According to four employees, C&S Wholesale Grocers, Inc., the nation's 8th largest privately held corporation, routinely cheats thousands of its piece-rate warehouse workers out of millions of dollars in weekly wages. The four employees filed a nationwide class action in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The workers seek $750 million from C&S in unpaid wages and overtime under the Federal Fair Labor Standards Act and state labor laws in each of the 14 states where the company operates warehouses. The case applies to workers who have been employed by C & S since 2000.
|