Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Amsted Industries' Retirees Lose Hundreds of Thousands of Dollars

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2851 | Employment | 11/03/2003

A class action has been filed against manufacturer Amsted Industries, Inc. on behalf of retired employee stock ownership plan participants who allege that the plan's trustees and administrators violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act and their own fiduciary duties to participants by improperly reducing the benefits obtainable by participants through the company's stock plan. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.

Amsted is owned by its employees through an Employment Stock Option Plan that is administered through the regulations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. At the end of each fiscal year, the Amsted ESOP distributes shares of stock to participants' individual ESOP retirement accounts. The ESOP allocates shares of stock to participants with a value equal to a percentage of their annual compensation. The participants' account values change not only with new share allocations each year, but also with the company's stock price fluctuations.

In the 1990s, the company developed a cash surplus and began a program of expansion, acquiring other companies. In May 1999, Amsted began a hostile takeover of a local competitor named Varlen Corporation. Amsted eventually succeeded in its bid, but only at an exaggerated stock price and the assumption of $250 million in Varlen's debt, the total coming to nearly $900 million.

This action alleges that the acquisition was carried out because of the personal agendas of Amsted management, rather than for the good of the company. The ESOP was directly affected by the acquisition, with the company's stock price soaring to $181.41 per share in September 1999, a 32% increase in value allegedly ignoring the negative aspects of the Varlen merger. The action alleges that this stock inflation occurred because Amsted management used accounting practices that neglected to factor in the negative side-effects of the Varlen merger.

In the months that followed, numerous ESOP distribution requests were submitted by employees who saw the stock increase as a chance to retire or resign while the stock price was most beneficial to their retirement. Under the terms of the ESOP, employees separating from the company either with 30 years of service or after reaching 55 years of age were eligible to receive the value of their ESOP account in a cash lump-sum payment. The rules and regulations of the ESOP expressly prohibited the limitation of early retirement benefits or retirement subsidies.

On March 2, 2000, the ESOP issued the 1999 Developments Report to Amsted employees--it expressly stated that the $181.41 share price was to be used for all ESOP withdrawal requests received by the company on or before June, 30, 2000. Named plaintiff Jackie Carlee is a retired employee of Amsted who served at the Bessemer, Alabama, Griffin Wheel plant. In April 2000, he submitted a written official notice of his intent to retire on June 30, 2000, so that he would have more than 30 years of service at retirement. In his letter, he requested that he be notified of any other actions that he needed to take to effectuate his retirement. On April 13, he called the benefits supervisor at Amsted headquarters in Chicago, Illinois, to confirm his retirement. At that time, he was informed that the current ESOP Account Distribution Forms were obsolete and that new forms were being created. He was advised not to complete the current form, and to wait for the new ones to arrive.

On April 25, 2000, the Amsted ESOP Committee allegedly met and substantially amended the plan, in violation of its regulations. The lump-sum plan was replaced by a plan that allowed the company to spread payments out over a four-year period with interest to be paid on the outstanding balance. The effect of the amendment was to issue retirees a lump sum of shares in Amsted stock and then to cash in the shares over the four-year period. The cash-out amounts were to be tied to the value of the stock at the time the disbursement was made. On September 30, 2000, the stock was reevaluated, its value falling to $89.87 per share, over 51% less than its former value. Because Mr. Carlee's retirement benefits were not given to him as Amsted promised, he has lost in excess of $285,000. Any subsequent downward reevaluations will cause him and other Amsted retirees in his position to lose even more.

The action has been consolidated by the Multidistrict Litigation Panel with three others in the federal court for the Northern District of Illinois, where it will be litigated.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

Mel McLean, owner of the Eel River Sawmills, and his wife Grace, had no children around 1988 when they created an Employee Stock Ownership Plan, according to background information in the lawsuit’s fourth amended complaint. The McLeans intended and promised to pass the majority ownership of Eel River Sawmills to its employees through the plan, the lawsuit stated. “If the promise had been kept, the employees would have had a majority ownership of the company and the dollar value of the company at the time of (owner Mel McLean’s) death appears to have been well in excess of $25 million,” the attorney for the plaintiffs said.
 
If your employer harms your retirement plan, federal law gives you a way to fight back. A class action has been filed against The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, certain of its officers and directors, and The Northern Trust Company on behalf of persons who participated in the Goodyear Employee Savings Plan for Salaried Employees between March 26, 1999, and October 22, 2003. The action alleges that the company violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) when officers breached their fiduciary duties by making false statements that had the effect of inflating the price of the company's stock and failing to sufficiently diversify the retirement plan's stock holdings.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Middle District Court of Florida against Global Executive Mortgage, Inc., a Florida-based mortgage company, for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) which establishes minimum wage, overtime pay, recordkeeping, and child labor standards affecting full-time and part-time workers in the private sector and in Federal, State, and local governments. Class members seek unpaid minimum wages, overtime compensation, damages, attorneys' fees and costs of the litigation.
 
A federal judge ordered AK Steel Corporation to pay at least $46.2 million to 1,250 former employees in a class action lawsuit over pension benefits. The 2002 lawsuit charged that the company had miscalculated the lump sum pension payment for participants in one of its pension plans. The plaintiffs claimed the method used to calculate the payments does not comply with federal law and resulted in underpayments.
 
A class action has been filed against the American Red Cross on behalf of all Texas employees, formerly paid by the hour, who have been "re-classified" as salaried employees and thus have been allegedly deprived of proper overtime compensation. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act, which regulates all facets of employee compensation, and is seeking back pay for the overtime the Red Cross allegedly defrauded the employees of.
 
Two former JPMorgan Chase & Co. employees are seeking class-action status for a lawsuit they filed against the bank’s unit.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2009 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.