Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Ameriquest Reaches $1.2 Million Settlement With Californians Who Were Forced to Pay Excessive Prepayment Penalties

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2845 | Credit / Debt | 11/03/2003

The parties have reached a tentative settlement, apparently valued at $1.2 million, in an action filed against Ameriquest Mortgage Company on behalf of borrowers who allege that the company miscalculated the amounts of the borrowers' prepayment penalties for paying off mortgages that were taken out between September 1998 and October 2001 on California property. The action alleged that the company's actions violated California's Unfair Business Practices Act. The claims deadline has been extended from December 9, 2003, to July 30, 2004. Claims must be submitted by the new date to be considered valid.

The class is composed of all persons (1) who signed promissory notes with Ameriquest secured by real property in California; (2) who either paid a prepayment penalty when the loan was paid off or will have to do so when it is paid off; and (3) whose promissory notes for such loans contain the "Borrower's Right to Prepay" paragraph as shown in either of the following two paragraphs:

"I may repay this Note at any time as provided for in this paragraph. If, within five (5) years from the date of the execution of the Mortgage or Deed which secures this Note, I make a voluntary or involuntary prepayment during any consecutive twelve (12) month period of any amount in excess of twenty (20%) of the original principal amount of this Note, I agree to pay a prepayment charge equal to six (6) months advance interest on all amounts paid in excess of my scheduled monthly payments that have come due as of the date of prepayment."

or

"I may repay this Note at any time as provided for in this paragraph. If, within the first Three (3) year(s) from the date of the execution of the Mortgage or Deed which secures this Note, I make a voluntary or involuntary prepayment during any consecutive twelve (12) month period of any amount in excess of twenty percent (20%) of the original principal amount of this Note, I agree to pay a prepayment charge equal to six (6) months advance interest, calculated at the rate in effect at the time of prepayment, on all amounts paid in excess of my scheduled monthly payments that have come due as of the date of prepayment."

The class is restricted to persons who entered into loans with Ameriquest and does not include persons who assumed these ans or bought property subject to these loans from the persons who actually borrowed the money from Ameriquest.

The action alleged that the prepayment penalty had not been calculated based on the amount owing at the time of payoff, but by using some other method. It also alleged that the prepayment penalty that the borrowers paid was not calculated on the original interest rate.

To determine if you may participate in this settlement, you should examine your promissory note from Ameriquest. The "borrower's right to prepay" paragraph appears on the second page of the note.

Eligible participants whose loans have been paid off and who submit valid claims will receive 35 percent of the difference between (a) the prepayment charge they paid and (b) the scheduled balance at time of payoff minus the total of the scheduled monthly payments which had come due on the loan through the date of payoff, multiplied by the loan interest rate at the time of payoff divided by two.

Example: Say you had a $150,000 Ameriquest loan and monthly payments of $1,207.00. You pay off the loan after 24 monthly payments were due. At the time the loan was paid off it had an interest rate of 9 percent. The balance at time of payoff was $147,854 and Ameriquest charged a prepayment penalty of $6,653. The refund would be based on taking the total of the 24 monthly payments of $1,207.00 which had come due on the loan (totaling $28,968) and deducting that amount from the scheduled balance at time of payoff of $147,854 which leaves a balance of $118,890. That amount would be multiplied by 9 percent and then divided by 2 giving a prepayment penalty of $5,350 If this were your loan, you would receive a settlement check for 35 percent of the difference between $6,653 and $5,350 or $456.

Note that the refund is based on the prepayment charge actually paid by the borrowers. If, based on this illustration, the borrower paid a prepayment penalty of $6,000, the Class members would receive a settlement check for 35 percent of the difference between $6,000 and $5,350 or $227.50.

If your Ameriquest loan has not been paid off, you will receive a certificate which must be submitted to Ameriquest within 60 days of the date that your Ameriquest loan is paid off, if you are to incur a prepayment charge at that time. If you do so, you will receive a refund that will be calculated based on the prepayment charge actually paid at the time of payoff. Note that the time period for which a prepayment penalty could be charged on loans made through September 2000 is five years and for loans written after that date is three years. You should examine your promissory note to see whether it has a three-year or a five-year prepayment penalty.

In order to obtain your refund or certificate, you must complete the claim form that is available at the settlement website and include any available documentation that indicates (1) that your loan was paid off and how much the prepayment penalty was, or (2) that you will be subject to a prepayment penalty when you do pay off your loan.

If you are entitled to a refund, the settlement check will be made payable jointly to all persons who signed the Ameriquest loan except that: (1) If any person who executed the loan is deceased the check will be made payable to the surviving borrower(s); (2) if all borrowers who executed the loan are deceased, the check will be made payable to the estate of the last surviving borrower or to all the heirs of the last surviving borrower, or (3) if the borrowers are divorced, separate checks will be made payable 50 percent to each borrower, if these borrowers so choose.

Please note that the checks will be mailed only once. Proceeds from checks returned or not cashed within six months will be made payable to a non-profit organization designated by the court.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in US District Court against ACE INA Holdings. The case involves violations of Federal Antitrust law. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
A federal court in Louisiana has certified the class in a class action filed against Imperial Adjustment Company and Equifax Credit Information Services alleging that Equifax gave Imperial unrestricted access to the personal credit reports of approximately 150 class members.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Northern District Court of Alabama against Franklin Collection Services, Inc. for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Class members seek actual and statutory damages, attorney's fees and costs of the litigation.
 
There is evidence that the some mortgage and loan companies commonly use "junk" fees to pad their profits unlawfully. The class has been certified in a class action filed against lender Washington Mutual, Inc. on behalf of mortgage borrowers who allege that since 1995 the company has charged them unlawful junk fees at the end of their mortgages in violation of their contracts and state consumer protection laws.
 
A Houston consumer protection attorney filed suit against Drive Financial Services, L.P. (Drive) alleging numerous violations of federal and state consumer protection laws while attempting to collect debts. According to the lawsuit, filed on behalf of Houston resident Velincia Plummer and others, Drive made it a practice to send people who fell behind in their payments a letter that violated the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and the Texas Debt Collection Act. Among other alleged violations, the letter threatens wage garnishment and pretends to be from an attorney or law firm, when in fact it was sent by Drive. Both are violations of consumer protection laws.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania against the Family Credit Counseling Corporation for violations of the Federal Credit Repair Organization Act. Class members seek compensatory, statutory and punitive damages, injunctive relief, attorney's fees and costs of the litigation.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.