Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Texas Auto Buyers Receive Class Certification in Action Challenging Their Payment of "Dealers Inventory Tax"

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2841 | Automotive | 10/20/2004

The class has been certified in an action filed against 636 Texas auto dealerships on behalf of certain car buyers who purchased cars after September 1, 1995, and were forced to pay "dealers inventory tax" to the dealerships in violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages.

Named plaintiff Jett Jones alleges that the auto dealer from whom he purchased a vehicle added to the negotiated price a charge for a vehicle inventory tax, either misrepresenting that the tax was to be paid by the purchaser or failing to disclose that it was actually owed by the dealer. Allegedly, all 636 car dealerships named in the action conspired to pass on this tax to unwary consumers.

The court noted the amount of money involved in the tax was set out on each separate sales sheet and could be easily and quickly ascertained and applied. The court ruled that the keystone of the action lies in the nature of the term used by each dealership to describe the tax. If the term "dealers inventory tax" was used in a sales document, the court concluded the purchaser does not qualify as a member of the class. If one of 29 other less accurate or descriptive terms was used to describe the charge, then the buyer qualifies as a member of the class.

The certification was affirmed by the Texas Court of Appeals, and a decision by the Texas Supreme Court is pending.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Automotive Cases of Interest

Attorneys are investigating claims of highway robbery performed by Las Vegas car rental companies such as Hertz, Budget and Avis. Instead of charging consumers market rate of gasoline and including the fill up in the price of the rental, consumers may have been charged upwards of $7.00 per gallon.
 
Three lawsuits have been filed in Superior Court by Formula One fans angry over the decision to run the U.S. Grand Prix with only six cars.
 
State Farm, the nation's largest auto insurer, continued to resell thousands of vehicles nationwide without disclosing they had been in wrecks even though the company had agreed years earlier to stop the practice. The company announced it would pay $40 million to owners of thousands of totaled vehicles that State Farm had sold without state salvage titles, as required by law. The company says the practice was a mistake.
 
The class has been certified in an action filed against State Farm Automobile Insurance Company on behalf of Nebraskans who were hurt in auto accidents, and who allege that the company overcharged them for managed care medical coverage under the guise of traditional indemnity medical coverage. The action alleges that State Farm overcharged consumers 15% to 20% for their coverage, in violation of Nebraska's Consumer Protection Act and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
 
Many people now leasing autos are overpaying because they didn't know how to get a good deal - or how to recognize a bad deal. A Florida class action has been filed against auto financing company Chase Manhattan Automotive Finance Corporation on behalf of vehicle lessees who allege that the company charged them "taxes" that were actually just undisclosed fees to cover wear and tear, and excess mileage on the vehicles, in violation of Florida consumer protection laws and the federal Consumer Leasing Act.
 
A group of 140 plaintiffs is suing Ford, GM, Wal-Mart, Sam's Club, AutoZone, and Advance Auto Parts. The plaintiffs are seeking a court ruling to be able to use the "product lines" they purchased as their proof of the required "product markets" in their antitrust suit for illegal price discrimination brought under the 1936 Federal Robinson-Patman Act.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.