South Carolina Residents Take Action Over Eagle's Allegedly Unsafe Electrical Outlets |
 |
 |
|
|
A class action has been filed against Eagle Electric Manufacturing Company, Inc. on behalf of South Carolina residents whose homes have an allegedly unsafe type of electrical outlet--a back plug-in outlet--manufactured by Eagle in violation of state consumer safety laws. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages.
Traditional electrical outlets use a set screw to securely hold the copper wire that supplies the current to the outlet. The action alleges that the outlets manufactured by Eagle Electric use a spring-loaded clamping device to hold the wires in place--if the spring becomes fatigued and fails, the wire may lose a secure connection to the outlet and become a fire hazard. This sort of outlet is occasionally referred to as a "back plug-in outlet."
The outlets targeted by the action are sold in hardware stores across the nation. The only way to ascertain if your home has them is to remove an outlet from the wall and look at its back. If the wires that bring current to the outlet are screwed down securely, your home does not have the plug-in type. If you are uncomfortable removing an outlet from the wall, you should contact an electrician to do it for you.
Certain cities, including Chicago, have banned the use of back plug-in outlets in certain applications. Underwriters Laboratories has issued a corrective bulletin about them, stating that enough complaints have been lodged to change the code standard.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Consumer Products Cases of Interest
A California man has filed a class action lawsuit against Motorola, Inc, in Cook County United States District Court. A lawsuit filed by lawyers in Maryland accuses Blue Hippo Funding of "an elaborate scheme to violate a host of federal and state consumer protection laws" through its broadcast and online sales of big-screen TVs, computers and other consumer items. Lawyers for the consumers argue that Blue Hippo collects payments from customers, then delays shipments and does not give refunds - even if the product is never delivered. Thousands of Rhode Islanders will be getting checks from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode Island. That’s after Blue Cross, the state’s largest health insurer, agreed on July 21, 2005 to settle two class-action lawsuits.
Under the settlement approved Friday, Blue Cross has agreed to pay 17-point-five (m) million dollars to settle the federal and state suits. The money will go to about 116-thousand current and former Blue Cross customers.
Pennsylvania law protects its residents from companies that use unscrupulous billing practices. The parties have reached a settlement in an enforcement action filed against national lawncare business Trugreen Chemlawn on behalf of more than 121,000 Pennsylvanians who paid an undisclosed fuel surcharge when they hired the company to perform various lawn care services between July 13 and December 31, 2000. Eligible participants should contact the Pennsylvania Attorney General's office for details.
Have you noticed that the cigarette companies no longer advertise that light cigarettes contain less tar and nicotine? A class action has been filed against Philip Morris USA, Inc. on behalf of New Hampshire residents who purchased and smoked Marlboro Light and Marlboro Ultralight cigarettes in the state at any time since 1971. These smokers allege that the company intentionally deceived them regarding the health hazards of smoking light cigarettes, in violation of New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act. In December 2005, a Detroit public radio station dumped its weekday music programs and replaced them with national news and talk shows, listeners reacted by banding together and filing a classaction lawsuit against the station. The lawsuit, which is now pending, accuses the managers of WDET-FM of fraud, alleging that listeners were tricked into contributing to a station they knew and cherished as a source of the eclectic music known as adult album alternative, or Triple A.
|