Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Strong Fund Investors Claim Managers Allowed "Timing"

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2792 | Stocks | 01/05/2005

A class action has been filed against privately-held Strong Financial Corporation and several related entities by investors who purchased shares in any Strong mutual fund between October 1, 1998, and July 3, 2003. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose that they improperly allowed certain hedge funds, including Canary Capital Partners and certain related entities to engage in "timing" of the funds' securities. The investors seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their securities.

Timing is excessive arbitrage trading undertaken to turn a quick profit. Timing injures ordinary mutual fund investors, who are not allowed to engage in this practice. The action alleges that, in return for receiving extra fees from Canary and other favored investors, Strong Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries allowed and facilitated Canary's timing activities, to the detriment of class members, who paid, dollar for dollar, for Canary's improper profits. These practices were undisclosed in the funds' prospectuses, which falsely represented that the funds actively policed against timing.

The Strong funds involved are the following:

Strong Advisor Bond Fund
Strong Advisor Municipal Bond Fund
Strong Advisor Municipal Select Fund
Strong Advisor Short Duration Bond A Fund
Strong Advisor Common Stock Fund
Strong Advisor Endeavor Large Cap Fund
Strong Advisor Focus Fund
Strong Advisor International Core Fund
Strong Advisor Large Company Core Fund
Strong Advisor Mid-Cap Growth Fund
Strong Advisor Small Cap Value Fund
Strong Advisor Strategic Income Fund
Strong Advisor U.S. Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
Strong Advisor U.S. Value
Strong Advisor Utilities and Energy Fund
Strong All Cap Value Fund
Strong Asia Pacific Fund
Strong Balanced Fund
Strong Blue Chip Fund
Strong Discovery Fund
Strong Dividend Income Fund
Strong Dow 30 Value Fund
Strong Endeavor Fund
Strong Energy Fund
Strong Enterprise Fund
Strong Growth & Income Fund
Strong Growth 20 Fund
Strong Growth Fund
Strong Index 500 Fund
Strong Large Cap Core Fund
Strong Large Cap Growth Fund
Strong Large Company Growth Fund
Strong Mid Cap Disciplined Fund
Strong Multi-Cap Value Fund
Strong Opportunity Fund
Strong Overseas Fund
Strong Small Company Value Fund
Strong Technology 100 Fund
Strong U.S. Emerging Growth Fund
Strong Value Fund
Strong Life Stages - Aggressive Portfolio Fund
Strong Life Stages - Conservative Portfolio Fund
Strong Life Stages - Moderate Portfolio Fund
Strong Corporate Bond Fund
Strong Corporate Income Fund
Strong High-Yield Bond Fund
Strong Government Securities Fund
Strong High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
Strong Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund
Strong Municipal Bond Fund
Strong Minnesota Tax-Free Fund
Strong Short-Term High-Yield Municipal Bond Fund
Strong Short-Term Municipal Bond Fund
Strong Short-Term Income Fund
Strong Short-Term Bond Fund
Strong Ultra Short-Term Income Fund
Strong Ultra Short-Term Municipal Income Fund
Strong Florida Municipal Money Market Fund
Strong Heritage Money Fund
Strong Money Market Fund
Strong Municipal Money Market Fund
Strong Tax-Free Money Fund

At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Stocks Cases of Interest

A class action has been filed against Fox Entertainment Group, Inc. (NYSE:FOX), a entertainment company and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 10, 2005, and the date that News Corp. consummates its purchase of Fox. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action has been filed against Sipex Corporation (NasdaqNM:SIPX), and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 11, 2003 and January 20, 2005. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, on behalf of all persons who purchased the common stock of Pharmos Corp. ("Pharmos" or the "Company") [Nasdaq:PARS] between May 5, 2003 and December 17, 2004, inclusive, (the "Class Period") against defendants Pharmos and certain officers of the Company.
 
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and the New York Stock Exchange has reached a $241,823,257 settlement in an enforcement action against five NYSE specialist firms, on behalf of investors who were harmed by the firms’ activities. The five settling specialist firms are Bear Wagner Specialists LLC; Fleet Specialist, Inc.; LaBranche & Co., LLC; Spear, Leeds & Kellogg Specialists LLC; and Van der Moolen Specialists USA, LLC. Persons who think they may be eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the listed Securities and Exchange Commission officers.
 
A class action has been filed against Lernout & Hauspie Speech Products, N.V. (LHSP), certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between April 28, 1998 and November 8, 2000. The action claims that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock.
 
Several class actions have been filed against entertainment broadcaster the Walt Disney Company (NYSE: DIS) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who sold the company's common stock on February 9, 2004, or February 10, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose that Comcast Corporation’s CEO had approached Disney with an offer to merge Disney and Comcast.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.