Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Alcoa's Florida Property Managers Seek Overtime Compensation

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2780 | Employment | 07/19/2004

A legal action has been filed against Alcoa, Inc. in U.S. District Court in Florida to recover unpaid overtime wages allegedly owed the company's employees in Broward County, Florida. The action is brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and seeks overtime compensation, liquidated damages and attorney's fees. The action covers all employees who were employed as "property managers" but mostly performed data entry, clerical and other related tasks.

Property managers were paid a fixed salary by Alcoa, based on a 40-hour work week. However, it was very common for these employees to work overtime. Alcoa did not establish any provisions to compensate employees who worked beyond 40 weekly hours. Under the FLSA, most employees are entitled to be paid time and a half for every hour worked in excess of 40.

Under the FLSA, plaintiffs must "opt in" or join the action, as the FLSA does not allow class actions.



At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

A class action lawsuit has been filed in the United States Disctict Court for the Middle District of Alabama against Green Tree Servicing, LLC. The case involves violations of employment law and focuses on the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available.
 
During the 1990s, many large companies converted their traditional pension plans to cash balance plans, generating a tremendous controversy in the process. A class action has been filed against CIGNA Corporation and the CIGNA Pension Plan on behalf of certain employees who allege that the company's changeover from a traditional retirement plan to a newer cash balance plan has cheated them out of part of their retirement, and does not treat identically situated employees equally by giving less to older ones, and causing age discrimination in violation of federal labor laws.
 
Reduction and even elimination of health care benefits is a growing source of controversy between U.S. corporations and their retirees. Two related class actions have been filed against Rexam, Inc.--the current owner of the American National Can Company--and the Rexam Retired Employees Group Insurance Plan on behalf of employees who retired from National Can and who now allege that Rexam has violated the federal Labor Management Relations Act and the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) by unilaterally reducing retiree medical benefits.
 
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, or national origin in any public establishment, if that establishment has a connection to interstate commerce. A national class action has been filed against the Boeing Company and the McDonnell Douglas Corporation by African-American employees who allege the airplane manufacturers violated the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against them based on their status as African-Americans.
 
Trucking has always been regarded as a predominantly male occupation, but women employed at trucking giant CH Robinson Worldwide claim that the company and it's male employees created an environment that crossed the legal boundary into active discrimination. A class action lawsuit filed against the company alleges that women were not paid as well or promoted to supervisory jobs as often as men, even though they were equally qualified. The suit also contends that the work environment at CH Robinson was extremely hostile to women as a result of lewd behavior on the part of male employees, including branch managers. A hearing on class certification in this gender discrimination suit was held in late November, 2004. At this time of this report a ruling had not yet been issued. If the class is certified as many as 2,000 current and former sales, operation and support workers would be able to sue the Minnesota based company.
 
State and federal civil rights laws protect Americans from being discriminated against based on their gender, race, and national origin, and in the state of California, marital status. A class action has been filed against the city of San Diego, California, on behalf of city employees who are vested in the City Employees' Retirement System, and who were unmarried when they retired or will be unmarried when they retire in the future. The action alleges that the city's retirement system discriminates against unmarried retirees in violation of federal and state civil rights laws.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.