Non-Retired Amsted Industries' Employees Stock Option Plan Participants Certified as Class Action Challenging Reduced Benefits |
 |
 |
|
|
The class has been certified in an action filed against manufacturer Amsted Industries, Inc. on behalf of non-retired employee stock ownership plan participants who allege that the company's trustees and administrators violated the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act by improperly reducing the benefits obtainable by participants. The action seeks unspecified compensatory damages. The court ruled that, in 1999, Amsted acquired another firm for an exaggerated price without performing an adequate independent evaluation for the benefit of Amsted's ESOP. As a result of the purchase, Amsted's stock value rose 32 percent in one year, prompting many participants to request distributions. The action alleges that, due to Amsted's mismanagement, the large volume of distribution requests significantly depleted the ESOP's assets.
Amsted responded to the depletion by amending the ESOP to make it more difficult to apply for and receive distributions. A group of current Amsted employees, along with a group of retirees, brought numerous lawsuits alleging Amsted breached its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act by reducing the benefits obtainable by participants. The court consolidated the numerous actions, separating the actions made by retirees from those made by nonretirees. The class in this action is limited to employees who have not yet retired.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Employment Cases of Interest
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Northern District Court of Texas against Zale Corporation, a Texas based diamond store and jeweler, for violations of employment law, specifically for racial discrimination. Class members seek declaratory judgment, damages, attorney's fees and costs. On October 5, 2005, the parties reached a tenative settlement on claims for overtime compensation. My significant other works for Electronic Arts, and I'm what you might call a disgruntled spouse." So starts the blog entry of an unhappy wife. But the details are enough to make anyone wince: mandatory hours of 9 AM to 10 PM, seven days a week--that's right, a MANDATORY 90+ hour work week. With NO overtime, NO compensation time, and no additional sick or vacation leave. If that sounds illegal, guess what? It is. And publicity about the unfair working conditions at the game producer has now resulted in the filing of a class action lawsuit against the company. The parties have reached a tentative $538,000 settlement in a class action filed against clothier The Gap, Inc. on behalf of African-American employees who were employed at the Gap's Gallatin, Tennessee, campus between October 7, 1999, and September 12, 2003. The action alleged that they were discriminated against in violation of the federal Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Tennessee Human Rights Act. Persons eligible to participate in the action should contact the class attorney for more information.
In 2000, Wal-Mart was named the "Sweatshop Retailer of the Year"--the plethora of labor actions filed against the company seems to verify the award. A class action has been filed against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and numerous janitorial services on behalf of immigrant workers who allege that the companies conspired to cheat them out of their wages and overtime pay in violation of the federal Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations Act.
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Western District Court of Louisiana against Gamestop Corporation. The case involves violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. Two former JPMorgan Chase & Co. employees are seeking class-action status for a lawsuit they filed against the bank’s unit.
|