|
Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.
 |
Case ID: 2754 | Credit / Debt | 09/26/2005
A class action has been filed against American Express Company on behalf of merchants who accept the company's charge cards, alleging that American Express uses its market power unlawfully to force class members to accept its credit cards at excessive rates in violation of federal antitrust laws. The action seeks treble damages as allowed by the Sherman Antitrust Act.
Named plaintiff Italian Colors Restaurant, of Oakland, California, alleges American Express uses its market muscle to force merchants to accept all American Express-branded credit cards in addition to the company's premium charge cards. American Express allegedly charges merchants a fee of 3 percent of the total transaction, compared to 1.9 percent for MasterCard. Visa charges slightly lower rates and Discover charges one-third what Visa charges. Allegedly, 70 percent of all Fortune 500 companies issue American Express charge cards to employees. The action alleges that AmEx has taken that advantage and used it to push its way into the conventional credit card market by telling merchants that they will be allowed to accept AmEx charge cards only if they also accept AmEx credit cards as well. Unlike a charge card, which must be paid off each month, a credit card allows holders to revolve their balance over the next month. Allegedly, Visa and MasterCard account for more than 90 percent of all transaction volume on credit cards. AmEx, of course, would like a bigger slice of the profits that come from the credit card market. The action alleges that American Express's credit card business has grown extraordinarily over the past five years: The point-of-sale dollar volume of American Express credit cards has increased at least 10 times more than any other credit card network. The action explains this phenomenal growth by pointing at American Express's contract agreements which allegedly tie AmEx credit card acceptance to acceptance of the company's charge cards. The prospective class is made up of all merchants who have accepted American Express charge cards, including the corporate card, and have been forced to accept American Express credit and debit cards, presumably since August 1999, since the Sherman Act allows a four-year window for plaintiffs to recover damages. Allegedly, merchants pay significantly more for the tied bundle of services than they would pay absent the coercive tie-in of the credit cards. Since merchants normally pass these types of costs along, prices will rise predictably, and consumers, forced to carry the additional cost of the card tie-in, are injured economically. A similar action has been filed in another court, so the attorneys in this action have asked the court to consolidate that, and any other future actions into this one. The other action is Il Forno, Inc. v. American Express Company (U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, docket number 2:03cv05055).
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints. Other Credit / Debt Cases of Interest Bankruptcy and foreclosure are terrible things--there's no reason for the mortgage company to make them more costly than necessary. The parties have reached a tentative settlement in an action filed against mortgage sub-servicer Cenlar, FSB, on behalf of Pennsylvania homeowners who allege that the company collected attorney's fees that were not provided for in their mortgage contracts when the homeowners entered bankruptcy or defaulted on their loans. Class counsel will mail claims forms on request after October 24, 2003.
If a telemarketer asks you for money up front, you should question the wisdom of paying. The Federal Trade Commission has reached a $3.9 million settlement with the Electronic Financial Group, Inc. on behalf of consumers who were taken advantage of by the defendants in advance-fee debit card marketing scams. Persons eligible to take part in the settlement should contact the FTC for more information. A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Northern District Court of California against Accounts Receivable Management, Inc. The case involves violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) which prohibits debt collectors from engaging in abusive, deceptive and unfair collection practices. No additional information about the substance of the allegations is available at this time. Classactionamerica.com will monitor this case and provide additional details as soon as they become available. Less than a month after TJX, the parent company of TJ Maxx, disclosed in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing that more than 45 million credit and debit card numbers may have been stolen from its IT systems over an 18-month period, the company is being hit with a class-action law suit seeking "tens of millions of dollars." A nationwide class action has been filed in Pennsylvania against mortgage insurance giant, Radian Guaranty. The action is brought on behalf of all U.S. residents who have obtained mortgage insurance from Radian at a less than best rate, and have not been informed that an adverse decision was made against them as a result of utilizing a credit report to set their insurance premium. The action is brought under the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act and seeks actual and statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. The parties have reached a proposed $7.87 million settlement of a class action against Republic Mortgage Insurance Company on behalf of mortgage borrowers whose mortgage was insured by Republic under a certificate that became effective between December 18, 1996, and March 31, 2003. The action claims that the insurance was provided on terms that were very favorable to the mortgage lenders. To recover under the settlement, class members must submit a claim form postmarked no later than September 8, 2003. |
IT'S FREE
|
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.
