Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Non-Whites Respond to J.C. Penney's False Shoplifting Accusations With Discrimination Action

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2749 | Civil Rights | 07/19/2004

A class action has been filed against J.C. Penney Company, Inc. on behalf of African Americans and other non-white shoppers who allege that, because of their race or color, they have been wrongfully targeted for shoplifting at J.C. Penney stores located throughout New York City and subsequently subjected to unlawful search and seizures, falsely imprisoned, harassed, and had their personal property wrongfully confiscated or damaged in violation of state and federal civil rights laws. The action seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages, and an order that will force the company to stop allowing its employees to act in a discriminatory fashion.

Named plaintiff Claudie Pierre is a 24-year-old African-American woman who lives in Queens County, New York. The action alleges that prior to her shocking run-in with store security she was a loyal Penney's customer. On September 20, 2002, as she was leaving the Penney's located at 90-51 Queens Boulevard, a security guard allegedly grabbed her by the shoulder and loudly accused her of stealing merchandise. Within moments, three more security personnel surrounded her, shouting and attracting the attention of pedestrians, some of whom allegedly joined in. A female guard continuously yelled, "You better return the merchandise you stole!"

Allegedly, she was held against her will and forced to return to the store, where she was detained out of sight in a small windowless room. Upon arrival, the guards yelled obscenities at her and claimed she had been under surveillance and that the guards had videotape of her stealing items in the store.

Allegedly, the guards forcibly emptied her pockets and grabbed her purse, pulling it away from her so that her arm was bruised. They took her school bag and emptied it on the floor, finding nothing. When they realized that she had no stolen merchandise in her possession, they allegedly began to scream at her that she had been seen stealing from the store on a previous occasion.

They continuously threatened to send her to jail for theft throughout her detention. While being subjected to prolonged interrogation, she was told, "We know we have your file here, bitch, and we told you never to come back here!" She was inappropriately patted down by a male security guard, who touched her buttocks, breasts, and inner thighs.

After leaving her alone for some time, the guards allegedly returned with a form for her to sign. Upon reading it, she discovered that it was a typed confession and agreement to be banned from shopping from Penney's because of past acts of shoplifting. When she refused to sign the form, the guards came back with a camera and took her picture. During the entire detention, she cried and pleaded her innocence to them. When she asked to call her mother so that she could report her situation, the guards refused to allow her.

Ms. Pierre was allegedly held for approximately three hours, and released when the store closed at nine o'clock in the evening. At that time, she was approached by named defendant Stefan Kowalsky, the manager of security in the store. He allegedly apologized for her arrest and detention and told her that she was free to go. When Ms. Pierre requested a copy of the arrest report, he refused, but gave her his card and told her he would mail it to her. She informed him of her intention to report the incident to the police. Kowalsky allegedly never mailed the report to her. After sitting outside the store for half an hour recovering, she called the police. Officers arrived and allegedly counseled her to file a formal complaint at the police station. A few days after her ordeal, Ms. Pierre filed a report with the police.

The action alleges that Ms. Pierre experienced anxiety attacks during her detention, and is now afraid to go into any Penny's stores for fear that her photograph has been circulated to other stores, so that she will be subjected to further harassment or detention regardless of where she shops.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Civil Rights Cases of Interest

The American Civil Liberties Union filed a class-action lawsuit in a South Dakota court, challenging the constitutionality of a federal law that denies financial aid to college students convicted of drug offenses.
 
A multi-state class action has been brought in Pennsylvania against Accredited Collection Agency, Inc. and attorney Norman G. Kalina. The action is brought on behalf of all Pennsylvania and New Jersey consumers who, since March 16, 2003, have been contacted by Accredited or Kalina in an effort to collect an alleged outstanding debt. The action is brought under the Federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and seeks actual and statutory damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against JAL Chemical Company, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all hourly employees of JAL who were not paid proper overtime compensation. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks statutory and liquidated damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants are required to "opt-in" to the case in order to be considered a member of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.
 
Page Unified School District received notice of a class action lawsuit being filed against it by the Diné Communities for Equality in Education and nine parents who allege that the Page Unified School District's (PUSD) elementary schools are segregated into “Indian” and “white” schools.
 
Ashley Peach of Illinois filed a class action suit against Wal-Mart on June 16, 2004, alleging the cashier at Wal-Mart failed to return a $1.39 balance on her gift card. In the complaint, sometime after Mother’s Day in May 2004, Peach purchased shampoo, conditioner, and other toiletries from the Granite City Wal-Mart, using two separate $10 gift cards to pay for the purchase that totaled $18.61.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in West Virginia against credit card customer service giant, Applied Card Systems, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all West Virginia employees of Applied who were not paid proper overtime compensation for all hours worked beyond 40 per week and who were terminated suddenly on April 23, 2003, when Applied closed its West Virginia operations without prior notice to employees. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and West Virginia labor laws and seeks back pay, statutory and liquidated damages as well as injunctive and declaratory relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants must voluntarily "opt-in" to the action in order to be considered a member of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.