Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Racial Minorities Claim that Allstate's Credit Scoring Doesn't Yield Fair Insurance Rates

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2728 | Insurance | 06/08/2006

A nationwide class action has been filed against Allstate Insurance Company alleging that Allstate's policy of using credit scores as a tool for determining automotive and homeowner insurance policy premiums is discriminatory and violates the civil rights of minority policyholders. The action was brought under the federal civil rights act and federal housing laws. The suit claims that Allstate uses credit scores, a factor which the plaintiffs believe has no reasonable relationship to risk of loss, to justify higher premiums for minority policyholders. The plaintiff seek to stop what they claim are the discriminatory sales of these policies.

Allstate has tried to have this case dismissed based on the McCarran-Ferguson Act, which bars federal law from impinging on a state's laws regulating the business of insurance. In Texas, the determination of policy premiums based on credit scores is highly regulated by the state. However, the trial court and the 5th circuit court of appeals have denied Allstate's arguments and allowed the case to continue. Allstate claims that its practices are not discriminatory and are fully authorized by state law.



At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Insurance Cases of Interest

The parties have reached a proposed $6,305,000 settlement in a class action against Coast National Insurance Company by former California automobile insurance policyholders who claim that Coast National wrongly canceled their policies for nonpayment of premiums. To recover under the settlement, class members must submit a claim form postmarked by September 15, 2003.
 
Insurance laws vary highly from state to state, and consumers should use every available resource to know those laws. A Florida class action has been filed against Allstate Indemnity Company and affiliate Deerbrook Insurance Company on behalf of insurance policyholders who allege that the companies wrongfully denied coverage for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) exams in violation of policyholder's personal injury protection (PIP) policies and Florida law.
 
Several class actions have been filed against certain officers and directors of Chinese insurance company China Life Insurance Company Limited (NYSE: LFC) by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between December 22, 2003, and February 3, 2004. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities.
 
It's bad enough to think that your insurance adjuster's bonuses may be based on his or her ability to get you to accept less than your claim is worth--worse to think that a machine may actually be calling the shots. The class has been certified in an action filed against Allstate Insurance Company on behalf of New Mexicans who allege that the company misuses a computer program named Colossus to settle their bodily injury claims for sums lower than those offered by any other insurance company, effectively cheating them in violation of New Mexico consumer protection and insurance law.
 
The Ohio State Insurance Fund for injured workers said it will pay $52 million to workers hurt on the job who won a class-action lawsuit that accused the agency of wrongly taking back payments for their injuries. The settlement affects about 7,900 workers that will receive the reimbursement for money taken under 1993 and 1995 laws that were later declared unconstitutional by the state Supreme Court.
 
1.5 million persons of all ages died in the Armenian Genocide of 1915. The parties have reached a tentative $20 million settlement in an action filed against New York Life Insurance Company on behalf of descendants of victims massacred in the Armenian Genocide of 1915, who allege that the company failed to pay life insurance policy proceeds to them. Persons eligible to participate in the settlement should contact the class attorneys.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.