Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Former Pan American Employees Go After the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation for Not Taking Care of Their Pensions

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2720 | Employment | 09/08/2004

A class action has been filed against the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation on behalf of former Pan American World Airways employees who allege that their benefits were severely damaged when the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation took over after Pan Am folded. The action seeks unspecified damages to compensate the former employees for their lost benefits.

In 1991, Pan Am's pension plan was terminated after the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation determined that the plan was severely underfunded. According to the court, the plan covered over 39,000 employees. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and Pan Am agreed that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation would act as the terminated plan's trustee.

In 1994, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation recovered $110 million from Pan Am's bankruptcy estate. Between 1995 and 2003, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation issued benefit determination letters (BDLs) to the plan's participants, informing them of the amount of benefits the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation had determined the participants were entitled to receive.

Three former Pan Am workers filed a class action in 1996 on behalf of themselves, the plan, and about 20,000 other Pan Am employees and retirees alleging, among other things, that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation breached its fiduciary duties under ERISA by failing to timely issue BDLs, by failing to provide participants with meaningful information about the plan, and by commingling plan assets.

The court recently ruled that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation acted as a statutory trustee, rather than as a government guarantor, when it calculated pension benefits owed to former Pan American World Airways employees, and thus can be sued for allegedly breaching its fiduciary duties. Because of its actions, the Corporation is now subject to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act's (ERISA) fiduciary responsibility provisions when it was acting as the terminated plan's trustee.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Employment Cases of Interest

Southern California Superior Court Judge David Velasquez granted class action certification to a lawsuit filed by three former Verizon telephone directory advertising sales representatives claiming the company unlawfully deducted corporate business losses from their wages between 2000 and 2005.
 
Current and former employees of Inter-Con Security Services filed a class-action lawsuit accusing the firm of violating federal and state laws by withholding overtime pay for security guards at Kaiser Permanente hospitals and other locations in California.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed on behalf of employees of Florida based Subway Plaza Corporation. The suit alleges that the company routinely denied overtime pay to employees who had worked hours in excess of 40 per week. The workers are seeking back overtime pay and other damages.
 
Former employees recently sued Software publisher Activision for failure to pay overtime compensation as required by California law.
 
Federal law protects workers from unexpected job losses due to unexpected layoffs. A $1.27 million judgment has been entered against the Chicago Housing Authority in favor of police officers, security officers, and employees in the authority's police department, which was closed in October 1999 without giving 60 days' notice to workers, as is required under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act), thereby violating the act.
 
A statewide collective action has been filed in Florida against Pepsi-Cola Bottling of Ft. Lauderdale-Palm Beach, Inc. The action is brought on behalf of all current and former Florida employees who, since November 24, 2000, did not receive overtime compensation as required for all hours worked in excess of 40 weekly. The action is brought under the federal Fair Labor Standards Act and seeks back-pay, compensatory damages, liquidated damages as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. As a collective action, all potential claimants must opt-in to the action in order to be considered part of the class. The employees have requested that the court issue notice to all potential claimants.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.