Search
Search through the thousands of lawsuits, complaints and recalls on our site.

Gulf Coast Mississippi Residents Say Deductible Was Unfairly Imposed by State Farm and Allstate in the Aftermath of Hurricane Georges

Report Fraud
Case ID: 2715 | Insurance | 09/23/2003

A proposed class action has been filed against State Farm Fire and Casualty Company and Allstate Insurance Company on behalf of Mississippi Gulf Coast residents who allege that the insurers caused unreasonable financial hardship in violation of state insurance law when they unfairly penalized homeowners by imposing a 2% deductible on homeowners' insurance policies in the aftermath of hurricane Georges in 1998. The action seeks damages equivalent to the amount of the deductibles that they were denied.

The proposed class is made up of Mississippi residents (1) who own or owned dwellings in Jackson, Harrison, or Hancock counties in Mississippi that were insured by either State Farm or Allstate, and (2) whose insurance recovery for damages from the hurricane was reduced or eliminated by the alleged deductible. The action alleges that the insurance companies conspired to impose the excessive deductible and threatened the Mississippi Insurance Commissioner with a denial of coverage for homeowners in the coastal counties unless the deductible was levied. The deductible was not imposed on residents of any other counties.

Allegedly, the effect of the discriminatory deductible was to unfairly penalize homeowners on the Mississippi Gulf Coast-- hurricanes often inflict damage to non-coastal counties of a magnitude equal to or greater than damage to coastal communities. The reduction or elimination of reimbursement due to the deductible was allegedly significant. For example, if a policyholder suffered $5,000 in damages and the face value of the policy was $100,000, the insurance carrier would pay only $3,000. In effect, the insurance companies were attempting to profit from the misfortunes of those whom they were obligated to protect.

The action seeks to assert claims on behalf of more than 13,000 residents as the first class action in the history of the state of Mississippi. Though the Mississippi Supreme Court has not adopted class action procedures, the identical issues of fact and law make a class action mechanism the most logical, prudent and fair manner to handle the cases. Mississippi is the only state in the country that does not utilize class actions.

Attorneys representing the Mississippi homeowner plaintiffs are doing so on a pro bono basis and are not seeking any attorney's fees.


At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.

Other Insurance Cases of Interest

Our senior citizens are one of the greatest assets we have. A class action has been filed against long-term care insurers Penn Treaty American Corporation and Penn Treaty Network America Insurance Company on behalf of all persons that purchased “Personal Freedom” long-term care policies from Penn Treaty within the state of Florida between January 1, 1997, and the present. The action alleges that the companies breached their fiduciary duties and committed fraud in connection with the sale of the policies.
 
Many corporate health benefit programs have been downgraded in the midst of the healthcare crisis. A class action has been filed against Case Corporation and successor to its former parent company, El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Company, on behalf of several thousand retirees and surviving spouses of retirees who worked for Case, who allege that El Paso is refusing to pay the cost for health care premiums for the group in violation of its contract with them.
 
A class action lawsuit has been filed in the Southern District Court of Indiana against Beazer Homes Investment Corporation, Inc. Hanover Insurance Company seeks a declaration that the it is not obligated or required to defend and indemnify Beazer Homes as an insurer because of Beazer's alleged fraudulent activity.
 
Is it right for a company to take out life insurance on its employees so that it can make a profit from its workers' death? A class action has been filed against Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. on behalf of widows of former New Hampshire Wal-Mart employees who allege that the company purchased life insurance policies on more than a thousand employees without their knowledge in violation of their right to privacy and in breach of the company's fiduciary duties to its employees.
 
A class-action lawsuit involving more than 2,200 physicians will be allowed to proceed after a Jackson County judge denied three insurance companies' request for arbitration.
 
Asbestos-related work injuries can be devastating. The parties have reached a tentative $375 million settlement in several class actions filed against Travelers Property Casualty Corporation on behalf of persons exposed to asbestos and their families, who allege that the insurer engaged in unfair trade practices by inappropriately handling and settling asbestos claims.
 
Become a LawCash Member - FREE!
'Find Money' E-Book
Weekly Email Alerts




privacy policy
YouNewz Beta
IT'S FREE

Report

Report Newz and easily upload your own newzworthy photos from your cell phone or computer to the web.

Share

Quickly share your photos with family, friends, co-workers, or the world with your own Newzpaper.

Read

Instantly find Newz and photos from other YouNewzers and read other YouNewzers Newzpapers.
 
Class Action Lawsuit Center || Product Recall Center || Consumer Complaint Center || About LawCash Link Exchange
Privacy Policy || Legal Policies || Terms & Conditions || Website Advertising Policy || Site Map || Top Lawsuits
LawCash® is a service of nola3, llc
© 2000 - 2008 Copyright. All rights reserved nola3, llc.

[ Home ]
LawCash
login
Justice is a click away.