CA Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Policyholders Settle Unauthorized UM/UIM Increases Action for $2 Million |
 |
 |
|
|
The parties have reached a tentative $2 million settlement in an action filed against Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company and related companies on behalf of California policyholders who were sent a selection/rejection form by the company and had their uninsured motorist coverage limits raised unilaterally by the company above $30,000/$60,000 and paid for the coverage between January 1, 1994, and December 31, 2002. The action alleges that in doing so, the company violated state unfair competition laws and the California Legal Remedies Act. Claim forms must be postmarked by October 22, 2003, to be considered valid. The action alleges that the companies, Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company, Nationwide Property & Casualty Company, and Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company, improperly sent selection/rejection slips to auto insurance policyholders who requested uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage that was less than the bodily injury coverage they had requested. The form allegedly indicated that the policyholder had to sign the form and return it to the company in order for the company to be able to issue UM/UIM coverage in an amount less than the bodily injury coverage. Allegedly, if the policyholder failed to return the form, the company automatically increased UM/UIM coverage to match the policyholder's bodily injury coverage, so that these policyholders saw increases to their insurance premiums. The claim payment process will proceed in two steps: First, all eligible policyholders who file a claim in a timely manner will receive a $75 payment via mail. Second, the claims administrator will make excess damage payments to those policyholders who establish that they suffered any damages greater than the $75 paid in the first step of the process. To receive a claim form, call the claims administrator at (866) 345-0359, Monday through Friday, PDT. To qualify for a payment above $75, policyholders must submit copies of any correspondence, bills, proof of payment, and copies of checks within their possession to establish each increased premium payment. The following must be established by the submitted information: (1) the date the payment was submitted to Nationwide; (2) the date the bill was received by the policyholder; and (3) the amount of the paid premium increase. The settlement will not be effective until the court grants it final approval. The court has scheduled a hearing on the matter for September 22, 2003.
At Lawcash.com, it is our goal to keep you informed about important legal cases, class actions and
settlements. Our lawyers offer free legal evaluations in tort cases, class actions, personal injury, and
other lawsuits because we are dedicated to helping you resolve your legal complaints.
Other Insurance Cases of Interest
"Reasonable and customary" provisions in healthcare policies often determine how much the insurer will pay on claims. The parties have reached a tentative $630,000 settlement in a class action against Educators Mutual Life Insurance Company on behalf of all persons who allege that. since September 1, 1998, the company reduced benefit payments for anesthesia services in violation of its contract with them. A class action suit filed in Baltimore alleges that CareFirst BlueCross BlueShield of Maryland has overcharged policyholders millions of dollars by jumping the gun on premium increases permitted by their health insurance policies. The parties have reached a tentative $3.25 million settlement in several actions filed against John Alden Financial Corporation and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between October 20, 1994, and May 3, 1995. Persons eligible to participate in the settlement must file a proof of claim postmarked no later than May 16, 2004. Whole life insurance policies can be a good investment, as well as providing security from an uncertain future. The parties have reached a settlement in an action filed against the Reliastar Life Insurance Company on behalf of all persons who have or had an ownership interest in a "Competitor" or "DVP" interest-sensitive whole life policy issued by the company or its subsidiaries between January 1, 1982, and December 31, 1996. Claims Review Process Forms must be postmarked no later than November 19, 2003, to be considered valid.
Companies that have allowed market timing trading have been in the news lately. Several class actions have been filed against global professional services firm Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (NYSE: MMC) and certain of its officers and directors by stockholders who purchased the company's common stock between January 3, 2000, through November 3, 2003. The actions claim that the defendants violated federal securities laws by issuing a series of material misrepresentations to the market over this time period, thereby artificially inflating the price of the company's securities. The stockholders seek to recover compensatory damages for the loss of value of their stock. A nationwide class action has been filed against Allstate Insurance Company alleging that Allstate's policy of using credit scores as a tool for determining automotive and homeowner insurance policy premiums is discriminatory and violates the civil rights of minority policyholders.
|